OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

  • 1.  RE: [office] Re: OFFICE-2608 and Errata CD04 Defects

    Posted 03-30-2010 18:44 
    PS: How does this square with ODF 1.1 already having been submitted, as is,
from OASIS to JTC1.


  • 2.  RE: [office] Re: OFFICE-2608 and Errata CD04 Defects

    Posted 03-30-2010 19:41 
    "Dennis E. Hamilton"


  • 3.  RE: [office] Re: OFFICE-2608 and Errata CD04 Defects

    Posted 03-30-2010 22:53 
    Good, I forgot about the reconciliation approach from the older discussions.

Is it good enough for the FPDAM to be prepared against IS 26300:2006 as it
is now, before the DCORi are finalized, and sync it all in the
reconciliation?

 - Dennis


    
                                                
    
					
                                                    

        
                                                
				
    
                                                
    
                                                    
                                                        
                                                        Original Message


  • 4.  RE: [office] Re: OFFICE-2608 and Errata CD04 Defects

    Posted 03-30-2010 23:36 
    "Dennis E. Hamilton"


  • 5.  RE: [office] Re: OFFICE-2608 and Errata CD04 Defects

    Posted 03-31-2010 01:23 
    I checked the comparison of the COR1/Errata01 changes made to ODF 1.1 and
the diff that Patrick prepared between 1.1 and IS 26300.

There are only 4 collisions that have to be watched for.  I think we might
as well do (A) for now and adjust manually for (B).  These are the
(potential) collisions to watch out for:

 1. Section 9.3.11 sub-section Common Image Map Attributes and Elements.
There is an Errata01/COR1 change *nearby* but an amendment done as change
marking can be structured to miss that.

 2. Section 15.27.22 Errata01/COR1 change to style:wrap-dynamic-threshold
(not -treshold) in the schema fragment has already been changed in 1.1 and
it looks like a delta from IS 26300:2006.

 3. Section 16.1 Datatypes under custom data types has an errata change to
-length and there are different changes (in other parts of the same text)
made in 1.1 in contrast to IS 26300:2006.

 4. Appendix B Errata01/COR1 change to [DOMEvents] appears to be clobbered
by [DOMEvents2] and [DOMEvents3] in ODF 1.1.

 - Dennis

PS: If there is to be a full-up amended IS 26300 document produced, I think
it should not be until the very end when the amendment and the two
Corrigenda are applied, with 1.1 and IS 26300:2006/fixed-up all assured to
be in synch.


    
                                                
    
					
                                                    

        
                                                
				
    
                                                
    
                                                    
                                                        
                                                        Original Message


Related Content