OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC

  • 1.  Ignorables

    Posted 09-07-2015 13:05




    Hi,
     
    I have a question about ignorables.
     
    Can you have two ignorables side-by-side (or would you usually just have one at start/between segments/or at end and what are the processing requirements for ignorables?

     
    Thanks,
    Ingo.
     
    Ingo Prause
    Principal Developer SDL   (t) +353 (01) 20 50 305
    SDL Global Solutions (Ireland) Limited La Vallee House, Upper Dargle Road, Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland   Registered in Ireland, Number
    135925
     


     
    www.sdl.com















    SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents,
    and we further request that you advise us.

    SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207.

    Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.





    This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com




  • 2.  RE: [xliff] Ignorables

    Posted 09-07-2015 13:36
    Hi Ingo,   Yes, you can have ignorable elements mixed anywhere with segment elements, including several side-by-side.   Usually ignorable would be used for non-translatabled “things” between segments. There are to some degree the equivalent of the possible spans of content between <mrk mtype='seg'> of 1.2.   They have the same model as a <segment>, so you need to take them into account for any operation that goes across all the parts of a <unit>, like re-ordering segments, computing non-translatable spans of content (the source of one ignorable can have a <sm translate='no'> that ends in two segments after for example), etc.   I hope this helps, -yves   From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Ingo Prause Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 7:05 AM To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [xliff] Ignorables   Hi,   I have a question about ignorables.   Can you have two ignorables side-by-side (or would you usually just have one at start/between segments/or at end and what are the processing requirements for ignorables?   Thanks, Ingo.   Ingo Prause Principal Developer SDL   (t) +353 (01) 20 50 305 SDL Global Solutions (Ireland) Limited La Vallee House, Upper Dargle Road, Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland   Registered in Ireland, Number 135925     www.sdl.com     SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us. SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207. Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK. This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com


  • 3.  RE: [xliff] Ignorables

    Posted 09-07-2015 13:50




    Hi Yves,
     
    Thank you for your answer.
     
    One more question – if you have two ignorables side-by-side, may they be merged together, or must they always remain independent items.
     
    Thanks,
    Ingo.
     



     
    www.sdl.com


















    SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents,
    and we further request that you advise us.

    SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207.

    Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.








    From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com]

    Sent: 07 September 2015 14:36
    To: Ingo Prause; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: RE: [xliff] Ignorables


     
    Hi Ingo,
     
    Yes, you can have ignorable elements mixed anywhere with segment elements, including several side-by-side.
     
    Usually ignorable would be used for non-translatabled “things” between segments. There are to some degree the equivalent of the possible spans of content between <mrk mtype='seg'>
    of 1.2.
     
    They have the same model as a <segment>, so you need to take them into account for any operation that goes across all the parts of a <unit>, like re-ordering segments, computing
    non-translatable spans of content (the source of one ignorable can have a <sm translate='no'> that ends in two segments after for example), etc.
     
    I hope this helps,
    -yves
     
     


    From:
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ]
    On Behalf Of Ingo Prause
    Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 7:05 AM
    To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: [xliff] Ignorables


     
    Hi,
     
    I have a question about ignorables.
     
    Can you have two ignorables side-by-side (or would you usually just have one at start/between segments/or at end and what are the processing requirements for ignorables?

     
    Thanks,
    Ingo.
     
    Ingo Prause
    Principal Developer SDL   (t) +353 (01) 20 50 305
    SDL Global Solutions (Ireland) Limited La Vallee House, Upper Dargle Road, Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland   Registered in Ireland, Number 135925
     

     
    www.sdl.com







     







     




    SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting
    upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us.

    SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207.

    Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.





     
    This message has been scanned for malware by Websense.
    www.websense.com
     
    Click

    here to report this email as spam.






  • 4.  RE: [xliff] Ignorables

    Posted 09-07-2015 14:02
    Hum, it’s a good question.   There is a canResegment attribute that could prevent segments to be re-segmented. But its definition doesn’t explicitly applies to ignorable elements.   So I’m not sure for that case. Input from other implementers would be great.   But for sure if there is no such attribute set to no on the parent unit, then yes, you can re-organize the ignorable elements.   -yves   From: Ingo Prause [mailto:iprause@sdl.com] Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 7:50 AM To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [xliff] Ignorables   Hi Yves,   Thank you for your answer.   One more question – if you have two ignorables side-by-side, may they be merged together, or must they always remain independent items.   Thanks, Ingo.     www.sdl.com     SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us. SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207. Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.   From: Yves Savourel [ mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com ] Sent: 07 September 2015 14:36 To: Ingo Prause; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [xliff] Ignorables   Hi Ingo,   Yes, you can have ignorable elements mixed anywhere with segment elements, including several side-by-side.   Usually ignorable would be used for non-translatabled “things” between segments. There are to some degree the equivalent of the possible spans of content between <mrk mtype='seg'> of 1.2.   They have the same model as a <segment>, so you need to take them into account for any operation that goes across all the parts of a <unit>, like re-ordering segments, computing non-translatable spans of content (the source of one ignorable can have a <sm translate='no'> that ends in two segments after for example), etc.   I hope this helps, -yves     From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Ingo Prause Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 7:05 AM To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [xliff] Ignorables   Hi,   I have a question about ignorables.   Can you have two ignorables side-by-side (or would you usually just have one at start/between segments/or at end and what are the processing requirements for ignorables?   Thanks, Ingo.   Ingo Prause Principal Developer SDL   (t) +353 (01) 20 50 305 SDL Global Solutions (Ireland) Limited La Vallee House, Upper Dargle Road, Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland   Registered in Ireland, Number 135925     www.sdl.com     SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us. SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207. Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.   This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com   Click here to report this email as spam.


  • 5.  Re: [xliff] Ignorables

    Posted 09-07-2015 16:50
    Sure, barring the segmentation being protected on higher levels, but this is also covered in the resegmentation PRs http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.0/xliff-core-v2.0.html#segmentationModification Dr. David Filip ======================= OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, and Liaison Officer  LRC CNGL CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452 mailto:  david.filip@ul.ie On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com > wrote: Hum, it’s a good question.   There is a canResegment attribute that could prevent segments to be re-segmented. But its definition doesn’t explicitly applies to ignorable elements.   So I’m not sure for that case. Input from other implementers would be great.   But for sure if there is no such attribute set to no on the parent unit, then yes, you can re-organize the ignorable elements.   -yves   From: Ingo Prause [mailto: iprause@sdl.com ] Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 7:50 AM To: Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com >; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [xliff] Ignorables   Hi Yves,   Thank you for your answer.   One more question – if you have two ignorables side-by-side, may they be merged together, or must they always remain independent items.   Thanks, Ingo.     www.sdl.com     SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us. SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207 . Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.   From: Yves Savourel [ mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com ] Sent: 07 September 2015 14:36 To: Ingo Prause; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [xliff] Ignorables   Hi Ingo,   Yes, you can have ignorable elements mixed anywhere with segment elements, including several side-by-side.   Usually ignorable would be used for non-translatabled “things” between segments. There are to some degree the equivalent of the possible spans of content between <mrk mtype='seg'> of 1.2.   They have the same model as a <segment>, so you need to take them into account for any operation that goes across all the parts of a <unit>, like re-ordering segments, computing non-translatable spans of content (the source of one ignorable can have a <sm translate='no'> that ends in two segments after for example), etc.   I hope this helps, -yves     From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Ingo Prause Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 7:05 AM To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [xliff] Ignorables   Hi,   I have a question about ignorables.   Can you have two ignorables side-by-side (or would you usually just have one at start/between segments/or at end and what are the processing requirements for ignorables?   Thanks, Ingo.   Ingo Prause Principal Developer SDL   (t) +353 (01) 20 50 305 SDL Global Solutions (Ireland) Limited La Vallee House, Upper Dargle Road, Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland   Registered in Ireland, Number 135925     www.sdl.com     SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us. SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207 . Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.   This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com   Click here to report this email as spam.


  • 6.  RE: [xliff] Ignorables

    Posted 09-07-2015 17:23
    Actually I think there is a small wording issue here: The resegmentation PR says:   Only   <segment>   or   <ignorable>   elements that have their   canResegment   value resolved to   yes   MAY be split.   And   Only   <segment>   or   <ignorable>   elements that have their   canResegment   value resolved to   yes   MAY be join with other elements.     Which seems to assume ignorable has a canResegment attribute. But that is not the case. We may want to re-word this (without changing the meaning).   So Ingo, I would say:   -    If the parent unit of the two ignorable elements resolves to ‘yes’ (i.e. is set to ‘yes’ or inherits ‘yes’) then you can join the two ignorable (following the PRs for a join operation) -    If the parent unit of the two ignorable elements resolves to ‘no’ (i.e. is set to ‘no’ or inherits ‘no’) then you cannot join the two ignorable elements.   Cheers, -yves     From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Dr. David Filip Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 10:49 AM To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> Cc: Ingo Prause <iprause@sdl.com>; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [xliff] Ignorables   Sure, barring the segmentation being protected on higher levels, but this is also covered in the resegmentation PRs http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.0/xliff-core-v2.0.html#segmentationModification Dr. David Filip ======================= OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, and Liaison Officer  LRC CNGL CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452 mailto:  david.filip@ul.ie   On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com > wrote: Hum, it’s a good question.   There is a canResegment attribute that could prevent segments to be re-segmented. But its definition doesn’t explicitly applies to ignorable elements.   So I’m not sure for that case. Input from other implementers would be great.   But for sure if there is no such attribute set to no on the parent unit, then yes, you can re-organize the ignorable elements.   -yves   From: Ingo Prause [mailto: iprause@sdl.com ] Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 7:50 AM To: Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com >; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [xliff] Ignorables   Hi Yves,   Thank you for your answer.   One more question – if you have two ignorables side-by-side, may they be merged together, or must they always remain independent items.   Thanks, Ingo.     www.sdl.com     SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us. SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207 . Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.   From: Yves Savourel [ mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com ] Sent: 07 September 2015 14:36 To: Ingo Prause; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [xliff] Ignorables   Hi Ingo,   Yes, you can have ignorable elements mixed anywhere with segment elements, including several side-by-side.   Usually ignorable would be used for non-translatabled “things” between segments. There are to some degree the equivalent of the possible spans of content between <mrk mtype='seg'> of 1.2.   They have the same model as a <segment>, so you need to take them into account for any operation that goes across all the parts of a <unit>, like re-ordering segments, computing non-translatable spans of content (the source of one ignorable can have a <sm translate='no'> that ends in two segments after for example), etc.   I hope this helps, -yves     From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Ingo Prause Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 7:05 AM To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [xliff] Ignorables   Hi,   I have a question about ignorables.   Can you have two ignorables side-by-side (or would you usually just have one at start/between segments/or at end and what are the processing requirements for ignorables?   Thanks, Ingo.   Ingo Prause Principal Developer SDL   (t) +353 (01) 20 50 305 SDL Global Solutions (Ireland) Limited La Vallee House, Upper Dargle Road, Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland   Registered in Ireland, Number 135925     www.sdl.com     SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us. SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207 . Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.   This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com   Click here to report this email as spam.  


  • 7.  RE: [xliff] Ignorables

    Posted 09-08-2015 06:29
      |   view attached




    Thanks Yves for the clarification.

    Regards,
    Ingo.
     



     
    www.sdl.com


















    SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents,
    and we further request that you advise us.

    SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207.

    Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.








    From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com]

    Sent: 07 September 2015 18:23
    To: 'Dr. David Filip'
    Cc: Ingo Prause; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: RE: [xliff] Ignorables


     
    Actually I think there is a small wording issue here:
    The resegmentation PR says:
     
    Only   <segment>   or   <ignorable>   elements
    that have their   canResegment   value
    resolved to   yes   MAY
    be split.
     
    And
     
    Only   <segment>   or   <ignorable>   elements
    that have their   canResegment   value
    resolved to   yes   MAY
    be join with other elements.
     
     
    Which seems to assume ignorable has a canResegment attribute. But that is not the case.
    We may want to re-word this (without changing the meaning).
     
    So Ingo, I would say:
     
    -   
    If the parent unit of the two ignorable elements resolves to ‘yes’ (i.e. is set to ‘yes’ or inherits ‘yes’) then you can join the two ignorable (following the PRs for
    a join operation)
    -   
    If the parent unit of the two ignorable elements resolves to ‘no’ (i.e. is set to ‘no’ or inherits ‘no’) then you cannot join the two ignorable elements.
     
    Cheers,
    -yves
     
     
    From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org]
    On Behalf Of Dr. David Filip
    Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 10:49 AM
    To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
    Cc: Ingo Prause <iprause@sdl.com>; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: Re: [xliff] Ignorables
     

    Sure, barring the segmentation being protected on higher levels, but this is also covered in the resegmentation PRs

    http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.0/xliff-core-v2.0.html#segmentationModification










    Dr. David Filip







    =======================

    OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, and Liaison Officer 


    LRC CNGL CSIS


    University of Limerick, Ireland


    telephone: +353-6120-2781


    cellphone: +353-86-0222-158


    facsimile: +353-6120-2734


    http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452


    mailto:  david.filip@ul.ie









     

    On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com > wrote:



    Hum, it’s a good question.
     
    There is a canResegment attribute that could prevent segments to be re-segmented. But its definition doesn’t explicitly
    applies to ignorable elements.
     
    So I’m not sure for that case. Input from other implementers would be great.
     
    But for sure if there is no such attribute set to no on the parent unit, then yes, you can re-organize the ignorable
    elements.
     
    -yves
     


    From: Ingo Prause [mailto: iprause@sdl.com ]

    Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 7:50 AM
    To: Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com >;
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: RE: [xliff] Ignorables




     
    Hi Yves,
     
    Thank you for your answer.
     
    One more question – if you have two ignorables side-by-side, may they be merged together, or must they always remain independent items.
     
    Thanks,
    Ingo.
     

     
    www.sdl.com







     







     




    SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete
    it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us.

    SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number:
    02675207 .
    Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.





     


    From: Yves
    Savourel [ mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com ]

    Sent: 07 September 2015 14:36
    To: Ingo Prause;
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: RE: [xliff] Ignorables


     
    Hi Ingo,
     
    Yes, you can have ignorable elements mixed anywhere with segment elements, including several side-by-side.
     
    Usually ignorable would be used for non-translatabled “things” between segments. There are to some degree the
    equivalent of the possible spans of content between <mrk mtype='seg'> of 1.2.
     
    They have the same model as a <segment>, so you need to take them into account for any operation that goes across
    all the parts of a <unit>, like re-ordering segments, computing non-translatable spans of content (the source of one ignorable can have a <sm translate='no'> that ends in two segments after for example), etc.
     
    I hope this helps,
    -yves
     
     


    From:
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ]
    On Behalf Of Ingo Prause
    Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 7:05 AM
    To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: [xliff] Ignorables


     
    Hi,
     
    I have a question about ignorables.
     
    Can you have two ignorables side-by-side (or would you usually just have one at start/between segments/or at end and what are the processing requirements for ignorables?

     
    Thanks,
    Ingo.
     
    Ingo Prause
    Principal Developer SDL   (t) +353 (01) 20 50 305
    SDL Global Solutions (Ireland) Limited La Vallee House, Upper Dargle Road, Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland   Registered in Ireland, Number 135925
     

     
    www.sdl.com







     







     




    SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete
    it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us.

    SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number:
    02675207 .
    Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.





     
    This message has been scanned for malware by Websense.
    www.websense.com
     
    Click

    here to report this email as spam.






     







  • 8.  Re: [xliff] Ignorables

    Posted 09-08-2015 07:40
    Ingo, Yves, I agree with that interpretation Some more caveats, corollaries You can join only adjacent segments/ignorables, BUT targets can be reordered (using the order attribute), so if the order attributes were set on targets this may have prevented the join.  On the other hand, you can split an ignorable to be able to reorder the targets.. Also even if the unit has canResegment="yes", you can have a situation where the ignorables cannot be joined if they are surrounded by segments with canResegment set to "no". You could still split them though, if they had more than 1 character. And you could still reorder them.. Cheers dF  Dr. David Filip ======================= OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, and Liaison Officer  LRC CNGL CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452 mailto:  david.filip@ul.ie On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com > wrote: Actually I think there is a small wording issue here: The resegmentation PR says:   Only   <segment>   or   <ignorable>   elements that have their   canResegment   value resolved to   yes   MAY be split.   And   Only   <segment>   or   <ignorable>   elements that have their   canResegment   value resolved to   yes   MAY be join with other elements.     Which seems to assume ignorable has a canResegment attribute. But that is not the case. We may want to re-word this (without changing the meaning).   So Ingo, I would say:   -    If the parent unit of the two ignorable elements resolves to ‘yes’ (i.e. is set to ‘yes’ or inherits ‘yes’) then you can join the two ignorable (following the PRs for a join operation) -    If the parent unit of the two ignorable elements resolves to ‘no’ (i.e. is set to ‘no’ or inherits ‘no’) then you cannot join the two ignorable elements.   Cheers, -yves     From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Dr. David Filip Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 10:49 AM To: Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com > Cc: Ingo Prause < iprause@sdl.com >; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [xliff] Ignorables   Sure, barring the segmentation being protected on higher levels, but this is also covered in the resegmentation PRs http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.0/xliff-core-v2.0.html#segmentationModification Dr. David Filip ======================= OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, and Liaison Officer  LRC CNGL CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452 mailto:  david.filip@ul.ie   On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com > wrote: Hum, it’s a good question.   There is a canResegment attribute that could prevent segments to be re-segmented. But its definition doesn’t explicitly applies to ignorable elements.   So I’m not sure for that case. Input from other implementers would be great.   But for sure if there is no such attribute set to no on the parent unit, then yes, you can re-organize the ignorable elements.   -yves   From: Ingo Prause [mailto: iprause@sdl.com ] Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 7:50 AM To: Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com >; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [xliff] Ignorables   Hi Yves,   Thank you for your answer.   One more question – if you have two ignorables side-by-side, may they be merged together, or must they always remain independent items.   Thanks, Ingo.     www.sdl.com     SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us. SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207 . Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.   From: Yves Savourel [ mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com ] Sent: 07 September 2015 14:36 To: Ingo Prause; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [xliff] Ignorables   Hi Ingo,   Yes, you can have ignorable elements mixed anywhere with segment elements, including several side-by-side.   Usually ignorable would be used for non-translatabled “things” between segments. There are to some degree the equivalent of the possible spans of content between <mrk mtype='seg'> of 1.2.   They have the same model as a <segment>, so you need to take them into account for any operation that goes across all the parts of a <unit>, like re-ordering segments, computing non-translatable spans of content (the source of one ignorable can have a <sm translate='no'> that ends in two segments after for example), etc.   I hope this helps, -yves     From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Ingo Prause Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 7:05 AM To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [xliff] Ignorables   Hi,   I have a question about ignorables.   Can you have two ignorables side-by-side (or would you usually just have one at start/between segments/or at end and what are the processing requirements for ignorables?   Thanks, Ingo.   Ingo Prause Principal Developer SDL   (t) +353 (01) 20 50 305 SDL Global Solutions (Ireland) Limited La Vallee House, Upper Dargle Road, Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland   Registered in Ireland, Number 135925     www.sdl.com     SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us. SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207 . Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.   This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com   Click here to report this email as spam.  


  • 9.  RE: [xliff] Ignorables

    Posted 09-08-2015 06:28
      |   view attached




    Thanks David,

     
    I’ll read that section you mentioned.
     
    Regards,
    Ingo.
     
    From: Dr. David Filip [mailto:David.Filip@ul.ie]

    Sent: 07 September 2015 17:49
    To: Yves Savourel
    Cc: Ingo Prause; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: Re: [xliff] Ignorables
     

    Sure, barring the segmentation being protected on higher levels, but this is also covered in the resegmentation PRs

    http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.0/xliff-core-v2.0.html#segmentationModification










    Dr. David Filip







    =======================

    OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, and Liaison Officer 


    LRC CNGL CSIS


    University of Limerick, Ireland


    telephone: +353-6120-2781


    cellphone: +353-86-0222-158


    facsimile: +353-6120-2734


    http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452


    mailto:  david.filip@ul.ie









     

    On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com > wrote:


    Hum, it’s a good question.
     
    There is a canResegment attribute that could prevent segments to be re-segmented. But its definition doesn’t explicitly
    applies to ignorable elements.
     
    So I’m not sure for that case. Input from other implementers would be great.
     
    But for sure if there is no such attribute set to no on the parent unit, then yes, you can re-organize the ignorable
    elements.
     
    -yves
     







     
    www.sdl.com


























    SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents,
    and we further request that you advise us.

    SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207.

    Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.












    From: Ingo Prause [mailto: iprause@sdl.com ]

    Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 7:50 AM
    To: Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com >;
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: RE: [xliff] Ignorables




     
    Hi Yves,
     
    Thank you for your answer.
     
    One more question – if you have two ignorables side-by-side, may they be merged together, or must they always remain independent items.
     
    Thanks,
    Ingo.
     

     
    www.sdl.com







     







     




    SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete
    it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us.

    SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number:
    02675207 .
    Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.





     


    From: Yves
    Savourel [ mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com ]

    Sent: 07 September 2015 14:36
    To: Ingo Prause;
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: RE: [xliff] Ignorables


     
    Hi Ingo,
     
    Yes, you can have ignorable elements mixed anywhere with segment elements, including several side-by-side.
     
    Usually ignorable would be used for non-translatabled “things” between segments. There are to some degree the
    equivalent of the possible spans of content between <mrk mtype='seg'> of 1.2.
     
    They have the same model as a <segment>, so you need to take them into account for any operation that goes across
    all the parts of a <unit>, like re-ordering segments, computing non-translatable spans of content (the source of one ignorable can have a <sm translate='no'> that ends in two segments after for example), etc.
     
    I hope this helps,
    -yves
     
     


    From:
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ]
    On Behalf Of Ingo Prause
    Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 7:05 AM
    To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: [xliff] Ignorables


     
    Hi,
     
    I have a question about ignorables.
     
    Can you have two ignorables side-by-side (or would you usually just have one at start/between segments/or at end and what are the processing requirements for ignorables?

     
    Thanks,
    Ingo.
     
    Ingo Prause
    Principal Developer SDL   (t) +353 (01) 20 50 305
    SDL Global Solutions (Ireland) Limited La Vallee House, Upper Dargle Road, Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland   Registered in Ireland, Number 135925
     

     
    www.sdl.com







     







     




    SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete
    it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us.

    SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number:
    02675207 .
    Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.





     
    This message has been scanned for malware by Websense.
    www.websense.com
     
    Click

    here to report this email as spam.





     







  • 10.  RE: [xliff] Ignorables

    Posted 09-07-2015 14:10
    Ingo, ur pretty much free to do anything with segments and ignorables. The constraints and prs are described in the section on resegmentation (modifying segmentation) in core chapter on inlines.. dF is AFK, so please bear with the typos and call me at +353860222158 if my answer seems insufficient.. On Sep 7, 2015 3:49 PM, "Ingo Prause" < iprause@sdl.com > wrote: Hi Yves,   Thank you for your answer.   One more question – if you have two ignorables side-by-side, may they be merged together, or must they always remain independent items.   Thanks, Ingo.     www.sdl.com SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us. SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207 . Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK. From: Yves Savourel [mailto: ysavourel@enlaso.com ] Sent: 07 September 2015 14:36 To: Ingo Prause; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [xliff] Ignorables   Hi Ingo,   Yes, you can have ignorable elements mixed anywhere with segment elements, including several side-by-side.   Usually ignorable would be used for non-translatabled “things” between segments. There are to some degree the equivalent of the possible spans of content between <mrk mtype='seg'> of 1.2.   They have the same model as a <segment>, so you need to take them into account for any operation that goes across all the parts of a <unit>, like re-ordering segments, computing non-translatable spans of content (the source of one ignorable can have a <sm translate='no'> that ends in two segments after for example), etc.   I hope this helps, -yves     From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Ingo Prause Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 7:05 AM To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [xliff] Ignorables   Hi,   I have a question about ignorables.   Can you have two ignorables side-by-side (or would you usually just have one at start/between segments/or at end and what are the processing requirements for ignorables?   Thanks, Ingo.   Ingo Prause Principal Developer SDL   (t) +353 (01) 20 50 305 SDL Global Solutions (Ireland) Limited La Vallee House, Upper Dargle Road, Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland   Registered in Ireland, Number 135925     www.sdl.com     SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us. SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207 . Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.   This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com   Click here to report this email as spam.