Hi Thomas,
the definition for shape actually includes the draw:frame element. So
the change is a superset of what we had before. (see 9.2 Drawing shapes).
Cheers,
Lars
Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Thursday 19 July 2007 17:04:21 Florian Reuter wrote:
>> please find attached a proposal to enhance hyperlinks to support shapes
>> in general and not only frames.
>
> Why did you remove the option to link to frames in your proposal?
>
> I think its valuable to link to a frame, even while most frames hold some
> sort of shape. There can be offsets involved which make the effect really
> different.
>
> On top of that; removing the option to link to frames doesn't seem
> backwards compatible (old docs liking to frames would become invalid)