EM Messages and Notification SC

 View Only

RE: [emergency-msg] Groups - EDXL-RM Committee Draft v1.0 Revision 2 (EDXL-RM-CD-v1.0-Revision-002.doc) uploaded

  • 1.  RE: [emergency-msg] Groups - EDXL-RM Committee Draft v1.0 Revision 2 (EDXL-RM-CD-v1.0-Revision-002.doc) uploaded

    Posted 05-11-2007 06:44
    Patti and Rex, thank you very much for producing these new versions of
    the document!  I haven't really looked at them properly yet, but I've
    skimmed the changes.  I noticed a couple of things I wanted to raise now
    before I forget:
    
     - There are now a lot of places in the document that now say
    "EDXLEDXLResourceMessage" instead of just "EDXLResourceMessage" - for
    example, all message examples now have "EDXLEDXLResourceMessage" as the
    top-level element.  I presume this came about through an overzealous
    search-and-replace - but it should be easily fixed with another
    search-and-replace.
    
     - The second bullet point in the comments section within the data
    dictionary entry for "ContactLocation" (line 2990) is not right, in my
    opinion.  I thought we decided it was preferable to put the postal
    address for a contact inside the CIQ Party Information (i.e., inside the
    AdditionalContactInformation element), together with closely related
    info like contact phone number(s) and email address(es)?  Please correct
    me if I'm wrong on this!  Also, the bullet point says "CurrentLocation"
    instead of "ContactLocation" (and similarly for the comment for the
    "AdditionalContactInformation" element). 
    
    Thanks,
    Karen.
    
    
    >