OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC

Folks, in my work today I ran a new test and I found an inconsistency in our latest additions to the model. The new "TenderEnvelopeID" as different qualifications in two uses: Tender Preparation. Tender_ Envelope Identifier. Identifier Tendered Project. Tender Envelope Identifier. Identifier And the new "TenderEnvelopeTypeCode" has the same inconsistent qualifications: Tender Preparation. Tender_ Envelope Type Code. Code Tendered Project. Tender Envelope Type Code. Code Usually in our model when the same BBIE is in two different ABIEs, they are qualified in the same manner. These are inconsistent. If it were left to me, I would say the possessive nouns are (respectively) "Tender Envelope" and "Tender Envelope Type" as I'm guessing (but I don't know) that a "Tender Envelope" is not just another kind of envelope but is something that people recognize as a noun. Since it isn't just another kind of envelope, it should not be qualified as a "Tender_ Envelope" but should be as it is known as a "Tender Envelope". I will proceed that way unless someone quickly corrects me. Thank you for your guidance on this. . . . . . . . . Ken -- Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal

yes i am with you on this Ken. On 13/05/13 4:39 PM, G. Ken Holman wrote: Folks, in my work today I ran a new test and I found an inconsistency in our latest additions to the model. The new "TenderEnvelopeID" as different qualifications in two uses: Tender Preparation. Tender_ Envelope Identifier. Identifier Tendered Project. Tender Envelope Identifier. Identifier And the new "TenderEnvelopeTypeCode" has the same inconsistent qualifications: Tender Preparation. Tender_ Envelope Type Code. Code Tendered Project. Tender Envelope Type Code. Code Usually in our model when the same BBIE is in two different ABIEs, they are qualified in the same manner. These are inconsistent. If it were left to me, I would say the possessive nouns are (respectively) "Tender Envelope" and "Tender Envelope Type" as I'm guessing (but I don't know) that a "Tender Envelope" is not just another kind of envelope but is something that people recognize as a noun. Since it isn't just another kind of envelope, it should not be qualified as a "Tender_ Envelope" but should be as it is known as a "Tender Envelope". I will proceed that way unless someone quickly corrects me. Thank you for your guidance on this. . . . . . . . . Ken -- Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php begin:vcard fn:Tim McGrath n:McGrath;Tim org:Document Engineering Services email;internet:tim.mcgrath@documentengineeringservices.com title:Managing Director tel;work:+61893352228 tel;home:+61438352228 tel;cell:+61438352228 url:www.documentengineeringservices.com version:2.1 end:vcard

Agree with you Ken Oriol El 13/05/2013, a las 16:39, G. Ken Holman escribió: > Folks, in my work today I ran a new test and I found an inconsistency in our latest additions to the model. > > The new "TenderEnvelopeID" as different qualifications in two uses: > Tender Preparation. Tender_ Envelope Identifier. Identifier > Tendered Project. Tender Envelope Identifier. Identifier > > And the new "TenderEnvelopeTypeCode" has the same inconsistent qualifications: > Tender Preparation. Tender_ Envelope Type Code. Code > Tendered Project. Tender Envelope Type Code. Code > > Usually in our model when the same BBIE is in two different ABIEs, they are qualified in the same manner. These are inconsistent. > > If it were left to me, I would say the possessive nouns are (respectively) "Tender Envelope" and "Tender Envelope Type" as I'm guessing (but I don't know) that a "Tender Envelope" is not just another kind of envelope but is something that people recognize as a noun. Since it isn't just another kind of envelope, it should not be qualified as a "Tender_ Envelope" but should be as it is known as a "Tender Envelope". > > I will proceed that way unless someone quickly corrects me. > > Thank you for your guidance on this. > > . . . . . . . . Ken > > -- > Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training > Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm > Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ > G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com > Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about > Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

Hi Ken I think you are on right track. I agree. /Peter -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:ubl@lists.oasis-open.org ] På vegne af G. Ken Holman Sendt: 13. maj 2013 16:39 Til: Universal Business Language Emne: [ubl] URGENT - inconsistent name components found in latest additions Folks, in my work today I ran a new test and I found an inconsistency in our latest additions to the model. The new "TenderEnvelopeID" as different qualifications in two uses: Tender Preparation. Tender_ Envelope Identifier. Identifier Tendered Project. Tender Envelope Identifier. Identifier And the new "TenderEnvelopeTypeCode" has the same inconsistent qualifications: Tender Preparation. Tender_ Envelope Type Code. Code Tendered Project. Tender Envelope Type Code. Code Usually in our model when the same BBIE is in two different ABIEs, they are qualified in the same manner. These are inconsistent. If it were left to me, I would say the possessive nouns are (respectively) "Tender Envelope" and "Tender Envelope Type" as I'm guessing (but I don't know) that a "Tender Envelope" is not just another kind of envelope but is something that people recognize as a noun. Since it isn't just another kind of envelope, it should not be qualified as a "Tender_ Envelope" but should be as it is known as a "Tender Envelope". I will proceed that way unless someone quickly corrects me. Thank you for your guidance on this. . . . . . . . . Ken -- Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php