Hi
Rodolfo,
I've
compared the Spec and the strict schema. I verify that the schema indeed
includes the state-qualifier value list for the count-type attribute, which is
not specified in the Spec. I think the best course of action is to
document this as a "fine-tuning" item to add to our future goals for errata, and
future versions of the spec. But I do not think it's critical, and I don't
think it should have any bearing on our plan to proceed toward OASIS
ballot.
If any
of the TC members have other thoughts I'd welcome them. Otherwise I'll be
happy to reply to Asgeir on the comment list, thanking him for his continued
help, and to inform him of our plans on the issue.
Thanks,
Bryan
Hi All,
Asgeir posted
the comment included below in the XLIFF-Comments mailing list.
Please
check the relevance of this issue.
Best regards,
Rodolfo M.
Raya
Heartsome
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Asgeir Frimannsson <asgeirf@gmail.com>
To: xliff-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [xliff-comment] XLIFF
1.2 Errata: Count-type
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:32:10 +1000
Hi all,
I just noticed a small inconsistency between the schema and
specification with regards to count-type attribute values:
The specification defines the following union of allowed values for
this attribute:
1) CountType value list
2) Xtend values
3) datatype value list
4) restype value list
5) state value list
The XML schema specifies the following values:
1) CountType value list
2) Xtend values
3) datatype value list
4) restype value list
5) state value list
6) state-qualifier value list
Notice that the schema allows state-qualifier values for this attribute...
cheers,
asgeir