OASIS Energy Interoperation TC

 View Only
  • 1.  Comments on CTS PR05

    Posted 03-24-2025 16:23
      |   view attached
    These are my detailed comments on CTS PR05, also. attached. as an RTF.
        •    Description for use of "market" and "originator" IDs should be clarified for Tender, Quote, and Transaction. They are not parallel, and the explanation is missing. An explanation of why there are "market" and "creator" IDs should be included, as well as an explanation of the "market" role.
        •    Table 5-3 explanation of TenderId is incomplete and incorrect-"Identifies Tender until Market Order ID is assigned by Market" does not describe who uses the two IDs. Correct to "ID assigned by the creator of the TenderBase (Tender, Quote, RFQ)"
        •    Specifically the absence of a TransactionIdType should be discussed near Table 6-4; one explanation might be "the actor that issues an EiCreateTransactionPayload is logically the 'market' for purposes of ID assignment; while the recipient may assign their own ID the one assigned by the 'market' controls."
        •    UidType (line 427ff) should be abstract with no instances; update Figure 2-2 and add explanatory text (informative) as to why there are so many ID Types.
        •    Line 1442 editorial - one row of table is on page 103 alone following four rows; should be kept together.
        •    Section 12.4 (1394) does not describe the InstrumentSummaryEnum correctly in Figures 12-3, 12-4 and tables-is the enumeration InstrumentSummaryEnum (Figure 12-4_) or InstrumentSummary (Figure 12-3)? Table 12-4 matches both Table 12-3 and Figure 12-4 but does not match Figure 12-3.  This entire section should be clarified and corrected. Validate use of the enumeration in Figure 12-2 and tables.
        •    Table 11-3 (1311) The Side Type description should talk about the "ticker payload" not "the referenced ticker".
        •    MMT Level Two is shown as an enumeration in Figure 13-9 and used for currentTradingPhase in Session Data; is this required by the conformance section? If required and not maintained by the underlying market, should there be an "UNDEFINED" value, or an explanation of use of UNKNOWN?

    Thanks!

    bill

    Attachment(s)