XLIFF TC Call

When:  Apr 17, 2018 from 11:00 to 12:00 (ET)
Description:

Call details inside private AI:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/members/action_item.php?action_item_id=3663



==========
Agenda:

I. Approve April 3, 2018 meeting minutes 
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201804/msg00005.html

II. Where do we go next?
  A. XLIFF 2.X or 3.0 wiki space for new features (Bryan)
    https://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/FeatureTracking

  B. TM Profile note

  C. ISO approval
  
  D. Heavily tagged content (Segment and Ignorable) (Phil) https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201804/msg00002.html
  
  E. IANA registration for Media Type application/xliff+xml (David)
  https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201804/msg00003.html

III. Subcommittee and sister TC reports
 A. Promotion and Liaison SC (note, moved XLIFF 2.1 press release under this topic)
 B. XOMOS - Sister TC

IV. New business



==========
Minutes:

Attendance: Phil, Tom, Lucía, Steven R. Loomis, Bryan.

Regrets: David F.

B: We have quorum.

Agenda

Bryan:  I move to approve April 3, 2018 meeting minutes
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201804/msg00005.html

P: I second.

B: Meeting minutes approved.

II. Where do we go next?
A. XLIFF 2.X or 3.0 wiki space for new features (Bryan)
https://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/FeatureTracking

B: We have this wiki to document the new features. 8 features have been requested, one discarded.

B: We are going to go through them to see if we can assign them owners.

2.1 Does anybody volunteer?

2.2 I have volunteered. I have not thought much about it yet to discuss it further here.

2.3. Steven could be a good owner.

S: I did not get a chance to discuss this with David. But I think that I would like to be on this.

            2.4. Change Tracking Module. Any volunteer to own it?

            P: I can do it.

            2.5 Top-Level Note.

            S: I can take this one two.

            2.6 Semantic Domain for Placeholders

            S: I can take this one two.

            2.7 SubSegment Matching and Referencing

            2.8 Rendering Requirements. We had worked in the past html rendering.

B: Steven and Phil, thank you for taking ownership of some of the features.

 

C. ISO approval
B: David is working on it.

P: I think I saw an announcement from Chet.

B: I saw the one from Robin.

B: There is a request for a majority vote in Chet’s email. We will stay tune for that.


D. Heavily tagged content (Segment and Ignorable) (Phil) https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201804/msg00002.html

B: Phil has made this request through the mailing list.

P: I was playing with 2.0 and 2.1 and wondering which one better suited me for my user case. The files I was testing were heavily tagged. I will work more on this.

S: Let me look at that, we might have some information on that. I will go back to you on that.

P: Great, thanks.

B: I am not aware of any mechanism in 2.1 that might help you.

P: In 2.1 you have one element which can help you to have a wider view of the element. And I was wondering how you modify it from the modifier point of view. It is more like an agent question, more than an XLIFF question itself.



E. IANA registration for Media Type application/xliff+xml (David)
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201804/msg00003.html

III. Subcommittee and sister TC reports
A. Promotion and Liaison SC (note, moved XLIFF 2.1 press release under this topic)

L: David and I have been working offline on the report, there are still minor items that we need to discuss but I think that  it will be ready to be discussed in the next subcommittee meeting and if approved it will be presented in the main TC.
B. XOMOS - Sister TC

S: we were able to discuss the modules support in OMOS, the discussion was around the extensibility points in OMOS and the modules, and specifically how the boundaries between XML and JSON can be crossed.

 

IV. New business

B: Meeting adjourned.

 

 

 



==========
Attendance:
Meeting Statistics
Quorum rule 51% of voting members
Achieved quorum yes
Individual Attendance Contributing Members: 5 of 34 (14%)
Voting Members: 4 of 6 (66%) (used for quorum calculation)
Company Attendance Contributing Companies: 4 of 16 (25%)
Voting Companies: 3 of 5 (60%)