XLIFF TC Call

When:  Jul 19, 2011 from 11:00 to 12:00 (ET)
Description: To access the meeting go to: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/277182288 - You can use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - Or, call in using your telephone: Dial: 1-630-869-1010 Access Code: 277-182-288 Meeting ID: 277-182-288 (meeting setup Courtesy of Yves)

==========
Agenda: 1/ Roll call 2/ Approve Tuesday, 05 July 2011 meeting minutes: Accept, reject, or amend. (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201107/msg00006.html) 3/ Sub Committee Reports - Inline text (Yves) - XLIFF Promotion and Liaison SC Charter Please be prepared to discuss David's SC proposal (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201107/msg00008.html) And here are the OASIS guidelines for SCs (http://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#subcommittees) 4/ Charter Draft (David F.) (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201106/msg00003.html) a. ACTION ITEM: All to read David's plan and comment as needed. b. Balance the Charter Draft with wiki tracker? c. Rename this to Working Charter? 5/ XLIFF 2.0 (http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF2.0/FeatureTracking) 1. Rodolfo has submitted XLIFF 2.0 work to SVN a. Rules around contributing/editing b. recommendations for Docbook tools (commercial and open source) 2. Review items approved in section 1 (http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF2.0/FeatureTracking) (we now have 4 approved new features and 21 proposed features to be evaluated) Note: Items 3 thru 6 are now moved into the Feature Tracking wiki - Let us see if we can deal with them there, and take them off of the agenda 3. XLIFF 2.0 Core a. Segmentation - Yves, et al. {Included this under 2.11} begin: (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201104/msg00005.html) most recent (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201104/msg00034.html) b. Philosophy of core vs. modules - David W. {added new entry 2.18} (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201104/msg00020.html) and (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00024.html) 4. XLIFF 2.0 Modules a. Rodolfo's latest schema with examples and two optional modules (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00023.html) b. Compliance - Rodolfo, Yves {propose we move this to the conformance section} (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201104/msg00031.html) - note, shall we table compliance until we begin Conformance criteria discussion? c. Crossover aligned segments - Yves {this might go under 2.12; but I added a new entry for now, 2.19} (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00038.html) - repeatable / reference-able Rodolfo: will try to come up with schema change to explore this. Let's make sure we have those on record (http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF2.0/FeatureTracking) d. Feedback from OpenTM2 XLIFF interoperability enhancements (Andrew Pimlott) (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-comment/201105/msg00000.html) 5. XLIFF 2.0 Attributes - Rodolfo {added new entry 2.20} (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201104/msg00056.html) - note, do we want attributes to be discussed at this level? or should they be discussed under 1. and 2. ? a. Translation status values for 2.0 - Yves {added new entry 2.21} (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201104/msg00058.html) 6. Element simpleNote - Yves {added new entry 2.22} (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201107/msg00009.html) 7. Conformance criteria 6/ Current XLIFF business 1. Alternate meeting focussed on Current Business? a. ACTION ITEM: David-F to prepare a short charter. 2. XLIFF and other standards: activity/impact a. LISA/OSCAR status b. Helena's announcement about Unicode Localization Interoperability Technical Committee (http://www.unicode.org/uli/) - - Note, Call for Participation: Unicode Localization Interoperability Kick-off (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00062.html) d. ETSI membership (Arle) e. XLIFF and TM, Glossary, Segmentation Rules (Christian) (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00043.html) - - Need a full discussion on this topic (Peter) (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00047.html) f. ISO/OASIS XLIFF - XLIFF as an ISO standard (Peter) Meeting debrief from Peter (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201106/msg00022.html) (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201010/msg00004.html) - - Note 1, Liaison report for TC 37 (Peter) (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00049.html) g. Schedule conversation (with TAUS, to discuss ideas around XLIFF promotion and evolution) (Bryan) Next Steps (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201106/msg00026.html) (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00031.html) h. A Burgeoning Initiative (Yves) (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201106/msg00021.html) 3. 2nd Annual XLIFF Symposium in Poland progress (Peter) 4. XLIFF Symposium 1 Debrief: "Voice of our customer" (Christian) - Christian's article is published; he's trying to get permission to distribute 5. Gathering common extension points from existing XLIFF Tools as a guide for 2.0 features (Bryan, Thomas) (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201101/msg00007.html) - Lucia has taken over Micah's matrix - David F is investigating funding for XLIFF tools page 6. XLIFF Spec in XLIFF (Lucia) 7. International Cloud Symposium: The intersection of policies, standards and best practices for robust trusted public sector cloud deployments. (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00029.html) a. The Symposium will be held October 10-13 in Slough, United Kingdom (near London). b. OASIS encourages us to conduct a F2F 8. Using remaining Multilingual Web Events (e.g. in Limerick) as an opportunity to talk about the current state and the possible future of XLIFF (Christian) 7/ New Business

==========
Minutes:

==========
Attendance:
Meeting Statistics
Quorum rule 51% of voting members
Achieved quorum true
Counts toward voter eligibility true
Individual Attendance Members: 11 of 37 (29%)
Voting Members: 10 of 13 (76%) (used for quorum calculation)
Company Attendance Companies: 8 of 23 (34%)
Voting Companies: 7 of 9 (77%)