Description: Toll Numbers:
USA +1-210-280-1707
Toll-Free Numbers:
USA 866-566-4838
Participant Passcode: 185771
==========
Agenda: DITA TC Wiki: http://wiki.oasis-open.org/dita/FrontPage
8:00-8:05 Roll call
Approve minutes from previous business meeting:
* (12 March 2007)
Business:
1. ITEM: Ranking for 1.2 list
1. ITEM: Review completeness of DITA 1.2 Specification Requirements
* http://wiki.oasis-open.org/dita/DITA_Specification_1%2e2_Requirements
1. Subcommittee updates?
8:50-8:55 Announcements/Opens
8:55 Adjourn
==========
Minutes: MEETING MINUTES -- 20 March 2007 -- DITA TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
(Minutes taken by JoAnn Hackos (joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com)
Date: Tuesday, 20 March 2007
Time: 08:00am - 09:00am PT
DITA Technical Committee Web site:
- Public: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=dita
- Members only: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/
- Wiki: http://wiki.oasis-open.org/dita/
- Roll call -> We have quorum
- Review/approve minutes from previous meeting:
- http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200703/msg00037.html (13 March 2007)
- Don moves to accept the minutes as read, JoAnn Hackos seconds, no objections,
minutes approved.
- Review and vote to close the 1.2 list of potential requirements:
- (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200703/msg00017.html
- Discussion of context-sensitive help
- Robert -- new items added by members during the past week are not yet included
in the list.
- Don and Michael -- discussion of Tony Self's proposal for context-sensitive help.
- Robert notes that IBM had released a specialization for context-sensitive help in
Source Forge. However this is specifically for Eclipse and will not apply to
other help systems.
- Michael improved support for context-sensitive help should be work on
- Discussion of the scope of the 1.2 specification
- Paul G -- What should the scope of the 1.2 effort be? need to define the roadmap
- Michael is for everyone to list top 5 choices to produce a shorter list. Items that
don't make anyone's lists will be lowest priority or off the list.
- Don -- The hope is to complete the 1.2 specification in one year.
- Michael -- should include a bug fix release and major functions that have been
waiting a long time for implementation. Definitely do the simple stuff.
- Paul G -- we are always trying to keep things simple and small. Will always take
longer than we'd like.
- Discssuion of various proposals
- Eliot K -- add to the keyref proposal/indirection from HYTIME spec
- Paul G -- reviewed all Paul's submissions and are all in place on the 1.2 list
- Don -- entry in place for the context-sensitive help proposal
- Erik H -- specification on topic refs in maps, 12047. Similar to topic groups and topic head
in map. No affect on the bookmap architecture.
- Yas -- version numbers are part of 12001
- Amber -- clarify printonly, which has been done in 1.1
- Eliot -- why the glossary addition. 12005 not needed, already clarified.
Machine industry proposals would be better as specializations. Should create a
policy for the TC about what is a specialization and what should be in the
base architecture.
- Chris K -- how will we package DITA in the future? Certain of the machine industry
proposals should become part of the base architecture.
- DECISION: Chris K proposes that the list be frozen in 2 weeks. Decides to ask for a place
holder for additional proposals from the machine industry SC.
- Robert suggests to freeze now. Agreement that the list is now complete.
- Eliot moved and Robert seconded to freeze the list now. Accepted with no objections.
- Note: Any additions after this point will be consider on a case-by-case basis.
- Announcement -- schedule an 11 am Eastern time meeting of the TC members attending the Content
Management Strategies conference in Boston next week. JoAnn will make arrangements.
--> Meeting adjourned.
==========
Attendance:
Meeting Statistics |
Quorum rule |
51% of voting members |
Achieved quorum |
true |
Counts toward voter eligibility |
true |
Individual Attendance |
Members: 16 of 114 (14%) Voting Members: 11 of 18 (61%) (used for quorum calculation) |
Company Attendance |
Companies: 11 of 56 (19%) Voting Companies: 8 of 13 (61%) |