Description:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/lexidma/members/action_item.php?action_item_id=3946
==========
Agenda:
Rollcall
Approve minutes from 12th Dec 2022
https://markmail.org/message/ge3xfnvth26fecm6
Review progress of Ontolex mapping, Etymology module clarifications and implementation of Carole's coments to the wd
AOB
Adjourn
==========
Minutes:
Quorum 5/7 voters (John, Simon, Michal, Carole, dF)
Approve minutes from 12th Dec 2022
https://markmail.org/message/ge3xfnvth26fecm6
Approved as minutes of record (dF moved, Simon seconded), no objections
Discussion of John’s PR and commented pdf
https://markmail.org/message/o2n57hvzsvtef45i
Consensus to simplify the modular design by removing the “tag” object type, make the structural constraints and requirements explicit in specialised modules
Changes in confusing terminology
Listing order -> relational listing order
Reverse listing order -> Listing order within entry
Inline module -> Annotation module (no matter if inline or stand off, depending on serialization)
Postponed:
Review progress of Ontolex mapping, [need to find a way to include Thierry]
Etymology module clarifications and
implementation of Carole's comments to the wd
AOB
https://www.academia.edu/93012315/Using_NVH_as_a_Backbone_Format_in_the_Lexonomy_Dictionary_Editor?email_work_card=title
Discussion of Miloš Jakubícek’s paper on NVH
We don’t plan NVH as a full blown serialization for the DMLex deliverable
But it’s okay to stay in examples
Adjourned
==========
Attendance:
| Meeting Statistics |
| Quorum rule |
51% of voting members
|
| Achieved quorum |
yes |
| Individual Attendance |
Contributing Members: 5 of 14 (35%)
Voting Members: 5 of 7 (71%) (used for quorum calculation)
|
| Company Attendance |
Contributing Companies: 5 of 9 (55%)
Voting Companies: 5 of 5 (100%)
|