Description:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/members/action_item.php?action_item_id=3663
==========
Agenda:
I. Approve October 2, 2018 meeting minutes
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201810/msg00000.html
II. Where do we go next?
A. XLIFF 2.X or 3.0 wiki space for new features (Bryan)
https://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/FeatureTracking
B. TM Profile note
C. ISO approval
D. A Special Majority Ballot to approve submitting XLIFF V2.1 OS to ISO has been set up
100% of eligable voters have voted - all in favor.
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201804/msg00012.html
E. IANA registration for Media Type application/xliff+xml (David)
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201804/msg00003.html
F. Propose we revert to 1-per-month XLIFF meetings in favor of increasing opportunity for off-line work. Can return to 2-per-month when workload justifies this. (Bryan)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201810/msg00001.html
G. TBX, TMX, and SRX as XLIFF modules - call for dialog (Bryan)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201810/msg00002.html
III. Subcommittee and sister TC reports
A. Promotion and Liaison SC (note, moved XLIFF 2.1 press release under this topic)
B. XOMOS - Sister TC
IV. New business
==========
Minutes:
Agenda
Bryan: I move to Approve October 2, 2018 meeting minutes
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201810/msg00000.html
Tom: I second.
B: Meeting minutes approved.
B: There are two new agenda items (F and G)
F. Propose we revert to 1-per-month XLIFF meetings in favour of increasing opportunity for off-line work. Can return to 2-per-month when workload justifies this. (Bryan)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201810/msg00001.html
G. TBX, TMX, and SRX as XLIFF modules - call for dialog (Bryan)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201810/msg00002.html
B: we did not get any dissent to option F. So it goes forward. Which week would be better the first or third?
Df: In my case, the third would work better.
L: Mine too, but it only based on the next few months.
Tom: I will also miss the first week in November.
B: Ok. So we will go for the third week of the month.
Df: We need to work on recruiting. To have the usual people back and new recruiting.
Df: we had a discussion with Andrez and he is inclined to one of the options (working on describing how to use the existing xliff).
B: It would be great to have him back.
Df: There is some work going in TAPICC. I would support to republishing this report as a subcommittee note. This is informative guidance for people that can be very useful. https://galaglobal.github.io/TAPICC/T1/WG3/XLIFF-EM-BP-V1.0-prd01.xhtml
https://galaglobal.github.io/TAPICC/T1/WG3/XLIFF-EM-BP-V1.0-prd01.pdf
B: Informative guides were indeed very useful in the past.
Df: we ran the public review through august but we did not get any comments, we did have comments before the public review. So, I think it would be good to have another review through us.
Df: Tom, Any progress on the ISO?
T: I haven't been able to do much on it for the last several weeks. I should be able to clear some time by this weekend.
Df: Peter Reynolds has offered his help.
B: I added the email to raise the topic of adopting lisa standards.
Df: Developing 2.2 seems not to be in the agenda of many people.
Df: We worked on a paper that basically refers to what the rendering module should include. It will be presented on ASLING conference (Translation & the computer). Once the paper is published I will present to the TC. There are things happening even if they are not happening on the TC.
Tapicc will also launch the other track on real-time exchange. The JLIFF model. This is why we even set up the sister committee on the first place. /github.com/oasis-tcs/xliff-omos-jliff I know that people have already implemented it. The schema is covering XLIFF 2.1. It was a very exciting work. The json schema is probably more powerful than the XSD. The people that played with it they said that it is useful for real-time exchange.
Df: we can keep the issues of the subcommittee on the main committee for the time being. The charter might need to be renewed.
L: Yes, before the end of the year. I can do that.
DF: JTC 1/SC 42 is looking into a liaison with artificial intelligence. I think it is very exciting. I think is under of our interests. Our industry has struggled with big data, mainly due to IP issues (the data belongs to the customers).
B: New business?
Df: I suggest that you (Bryan) make a call for feature owners to work on their features in between meetings. We can also work on recruiting more people to the TC.
Tom: I'll put in a plug at the DITA Europe conference next month. I've also reached out to TransPerfect via Vasont, but haven't heard anything back. Vasont is CMS software.
Df: there is also interest in extraction, like the work done by Simone Chiaretta for Umbraco.
==========
Attendance: