Standing XLIFF Teleconference (Bi-Weekly)

Description: Tuesdays 04:00PM London/Dublin / 08:00 AM PST International Dial-In: +44 118 376 9023 Meeting ID: 30543

==========
Agenda: Agenda: 1/Roll Call... 2/Review and accept previous meeting minutes as formal record, amending if necessary (http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/event.php?event_id=2740&day=1064916000) 3/Peer review - Yves, David, John. -Result of Post Peer Review ballots- both ballots passed, with a small degree of dissent: a)Change the id attribute from type NMTOKEN to string: ( http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/ballot.php?id=228&vr=1&ew=) Result= 9 of 10 (of 17 eligible) voted to change to string. Is a formal minority report required? b)Add new annotates attribute to note element: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/ballot.php?id=229& Result = 9 of 11 (of 17 eligible) votes cast in favour Is a formal minority report required? c)Spec and XSD to change due to ballot changes. Any further changes? d)Time frames and procedures for submission of 1.1 to review panel (we shall assign date values to these items at the telecon): -modify spec and XSD -note: small changes do not require another peer review. -vote to accept modified spec as Committee spec. -Submit for standards review - 15 days to review spec, then 15 days to vote. 4/Reminder - Face to Face (F2F) - Friday 12 Dec, Washington DC. Details being ironed out. 5/Any other business 6/Next meeting proposed for Tuesday 28 Oct 2003 at 4pm GMT

==========
Minutes: 1/Roll Call There were 10 members present as recorded in Kavi 2/Review and accept previous meeting minutes as formal record, amending if necessary (http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/event.php?event_id=2740&day=1064916000) This was proposed by Mat and seconded by Mark. 3/Peer review b)Add new annotates attribute to note element: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/ballot.php?id=229& Result = 9 of 11 (of 17 eligible) votes cast in favour Is a formal minority report required? There were two votes against Tony announced the results of the ballot and invited John and Mark to outline the issues they had with the proposals. John suggested that this was not particularly a major change and would not need a minority report. Mark agreed. He suggested that there could be more elegant It was agreed that we will document the new attribute value and only the note value will be modified. Mark asked that this be discussed for the next release. a)Change the id attribute from type NMTOKEN to string: ( http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/ballot.php?id=228&vr=1&ew=) Result= 9 of 10 (of 17 eligible) voted to change to string. There was one vote against Mark outlined why he had voted against. He was concerened about how this might limit us at some future stage. He said that there was not a need for a minority report. c)Spec and XSD to change due to ballot changes. The changes will be made following the ballot. d)Time frames and procedures for submission of 1.1 to review panel (we shall assign date values to these items at the telecon): -modify spec and XSD - Tony will ask yves to do these changes. -vote to accept modified spec as Committee spec. - This will be at our next meeting on October 28th. The modified spec will be sent to members at October 23rd. for a voice vote on October 28th. -Submit for standards review - If the spec is approved on October 28th we will vote on submitting the spect and then submit it on November 3rd.. There will be 15 days to review spec which brings us to November 18th. Voting will take place from November 18th to December 3rd. when the voting ends. 4/Reminder - Face to Face (F2F) - Friday 12 Dec, Washington DC. Tony suggested that this could be devoted to changes to 1.1 which focussed less on changes to the standards and more on examples and data types. 5/Any other business - none 6/Next meeting proposed for Tuesday 28 Oct 2003 at 4pm GMT

==========
Attendance:

Achieved quorum: false
Counts toward voter eligibility: true

Individual Attendance

• Members: 10 of 41 (24%)
• Voting Members: 7 of 17 (41%) (used for quorum calculation)

Company Attendance

• Companies: 7 of 19 (36%)
• Voting Companies: 5 of 10 (50%)

Quorum rule: 51% of voting members