Description:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff-omos/members/action_item.php?action_item_id=3822
==========
Agenda:
Rollcall
Scribe
Approve minutes from 27th November
TBP
Outstanding JLIFF schema issues
checking URIs vs IRIs
Prefixing modules vs. Grouping modules data [Robert might have started experimenting with this in a separate folder. Prefixing considered canonical for now]
AIRobert: Change examples to use prefixes for modules
Review prose spec progress for both JLIFF and OM
Future meetings
January 22, 2019
AOB
==========
Minutes:
Rollcall
David F., James H., Steven L., Robert v.E.
Scribe
Approve minutes from 27th November
TBP
Outstanding JLIFF schema issues
checking URIs vs IRIs
Steven: I didn’t get a chance to send that. Can we specify in a schema if we validate by IRI vs. URI
David: This is still unsolved in XML as well. It is not a very useful validation actually because it is very tricky to test URIs.
Robert: I left it unconstrained because the RFC standard is a “moving standard”, and we worried about interoperability.
Steven: There are subtypes that are used that make sense for a JLIFF document.
David: Can ABNF be used to validate in JSON schema?
Steven: https://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47#section-2.1
David: Unless we can validate ABNF in JSON, we may need to put this in the prose documentation.
Steven: I have found a large RegEx expression to validate this.
Robert: Keep in mind that RegEx is limited in JSON Schema (no lookahead / lookbehind)
Steven: It may be possible to have something that is slightly too permissive, to catch most cases, but possibly not all.
Action: Robert will look at the large RegEx expression
Prefixing modules vs. Grouping modules data [Robert might have started experimenting with this in a separate folder. Prefixing considered canonical for now]
Robert: did this work in JLIFF 2.1
Action: Steven will check this as well
AIRobert: Change examples to use prefixes for modules
Review prose spec progress for both JLIFF and OM
Action: David will be developing the XLIFF Prague paper to hopefully review by the next meeting
Action: James will work on TBX Mapping, goal to finish by end of Feb.
Future meetings
January 22, 2019
AOB
==========
Attendance:
| Meeting Statistics |
| Quorum rule |
51% of voting members
|
| Achieved quorum |
yes |
| Individual Attendance |
Contributing Members: 4 of 18 (22%)
Voting Members: 4 of 5 (80%) (used for quorum calculation)
|
| Company Attendance |
Contributing Companies: 4 of 15 (26%)
Voting Companies: 4 of 5 (80%)
|