Description: Tuesdays 04:00PM London/Dublin / 08:00 AM PST
International Dial-In: +44 118 376 9023
Meeting ID: 30543
==========
Agenda: 1/Roll Call
2/Review and accept previous meeting minutes as formal record, amending if necessary: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/event.php?event_id=2743&day=1068548400
3/Discuss and agree to process for how minor spec revisions roll up into Committee Specification.
Options:
-formally vote for Committee Spec each time a minor change occurs
-regular periodic vote, either bimonthly or quarterly
-other option?
4/Feedback from LRC Standards convention from last week
5/Face to Face (F2F) - 8AM EST / 1PM GMT / 5AM PST Friday 12 Dec, Washington DC
-Review/tweak Agenda (http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200311/msg00009.html)
-Expected attendance
-Meeting logistics - dialup, guests, voting, etc.
6/Any other business
7/Next meeting is the Face to Face in DC, Friday 12 Dec 2003 at 1pmGMT/8am EST/5am PST
==========
Minutes: 1/Roll Call
>> (in KAVI)
2/Review and accept previous meeting minutes as formal record, amending
if necessary:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/event.php?event_id=2743&day=1068548400
>> Mat proposed acceptance; David seconded
3/Discuss and agree to process for how minor spec revisions roll up
into Committee Specification.
Options:
-formally vote for Committee Spec each time a minor change
occurs
-regular periodic vote, either bimonthly or quarterly
-other option?
>> This discussion revolved around how we would handle the errors that are found in the specification both before submitting the 1.1
specification to OASIS as a standard and once 1.1 became an OASIS
Standard. In the former situation it was agreed that we would make an
effort to discover and correct errors prior to submitting the spec to
OASIS. In the latter situation, it was agreed that we would create an
errata that could be accessed from our website. There was discussion as
to how often the errata would be rolled-up into the official
specification. However, as the actual published document would be the
OASIS Specification and any change would require resubmittal of the
specification or creation of a committee specification that conflicted
with the official OASIS Standard, it was agreed that the errata would
exist until a new version of the specification was being prepared, such
as a 2.0 version.
>> It was requested that as errors are found they are noted on the XLIFF
TC email list and that members become familiar with the issue prior to
the next TC meeting. The agenda for the TC meetings will have a regular
scheduled item for resolution of any noted errors on the list.
4/Feedback from LRC Standards convention from last week
>> Tony and Enda reported on their attendance. There was significant
discussion of XLIFF at this convention, both positive and negative. Two
problems brought forth are that XLIFF is another format that vendors
must add support for, i.e. rather than simplifying the list it adds to
it, and the issue of the lack of canonical representation of various
formats makes for reduced interoperability.
>> XLIFF is being adopted, though, and there is pressure on tool vendors to support it.
5/Face to Face (F2F) - 8AM EST / 1PM GMT / 5AM PST Friday 12 Dec,
Washington DC
-Review/tweak Agenda
(http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200311/msg00009.html)
>> Tony has received no feedback to date on proposed aganda.
>> We reviewed the agenda and it seemed acceptable to all. There was a
brief discussion about certification of implementations but no
resolution.
-Expected attendance
>> Tony will create a ballot of who will attend physically and who will
attend via teleconference.
-Meeting logistics - dialup, guests, voting, etc.
>> No discussion
6/Any other business
>> None
7/Next meeting is the Face to Face in DC, Friday 12 Dec 2003 at
1pmGMT/8am EST/5am PST
>> Meeting adjourned
==========
Attendance:
Achieved quorum: true
Counts toward voter eligibility: true
Individual Attendance- Members: 9 of 41 (21%)
- Voting Members: 9 of 17 (52%) (used for quorum calculation)
Company Attendance- Companies: 7 of 19 (36%)
- Voting Companies: 7 of 10 (70%)
Quorum rule: 51% of voting members