Description: To access the meeting go to:
https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/277182288
- You can use your microphone and speakers (VoIP)
- Or, call in using your telephone:
Dial: 1-630-869-1010
Access Code: 277-182-288
Meeting ID: 277-182-288
(meeting setup Courtesy of Yves)
==========
Agenda: 1/ Roll call
2/ Approve Tuesday, 03 May 2011 meeting minutes:
Accept, reject, or amend.
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00017.html)
3/ Sub Committee Reports
- Inline text (Yves)
4/ Current XLIFF business (moved this before XLIFF 2.0 due to the volume)
1. XLIFF and other standards: activity/impact
(note: I hope I got the chronology and phylogenetics (evolution of threads) correct on 4.1.a through 4.1.c - Yves, feel free to rearrange these points in the notes as they sort out in our discussion)
a. Peter's request that our TC, along with former OSCAR
members discuss OASIS/XIFF taking over TMX/SRX
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201103/msg00015.html)
- - Note 1, Christian noted Arle's blog on this topic
(http://www.gala-global.org/blog/)
- - Note 2, Peter wrote a reply
(http://blog.maart.com/en/content/standards-reactivation-lisa-estate-saga-continues)
b. Helena's announcement about Unicode Localization Interoperability Technical Committee
(http://www.unicode.org/uli/)
- - Note 1, Helena called an off-line meeting
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00006.html)
- - Note 2, Call for Participation: Unicode Localization Interoperability Kick-off
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00062.html)
c. ETSI membership (Peter)
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00018.html)
- - Note, the PDF file has changes since Peter posted his note
(http://docbox.etsi.org/M2M/Open/Information/ISGLIS/ETSI-ISGLIS.pdf)
d. XLIFF and TM, Glossary, Segmentation Rules (Christian)
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00043.html)
- - Need a full discussion on this topic (Peter)
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00047.html)
e. ISO/OASIS XLIFF - XLIFF as an ISO standard (Peter)
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201010/msg00004.html)
- - Note 1, Liaison report for TC 37 (Peter)
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00049.html)
f. Schedule conversation (with TAUS, to discuss ideas around
XLIFF promotion and evolution) (Bryan)
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00031.html)
2. Ballot passed: The XLIFF TC shall elect a representative
from OASIS XLIFF TC to Unicode for the formal liaison
membership between Unicode Consortium and the
OASIS XLIFF TC.
(http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/ballot.php?id=2027)
a. Results: Yes (6), No (0), Abstain (4)
b. Robin Cover provided guidance on liaison:
(http://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/liaison#tcliaison)
c. Christian recommends the tasks (including rights and obligations)
of the liaison person get discussed before the election
(http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/vote_details.php?id=2027&voter_id=426)
3. 2nd Annual XLIFF Symposium in Poland progress (Peter)
4. XLIFF Symposium 1 Debrief: "Voice of our customer" (Christian)
- Christian is in contact with Multilingual and has written to Robin Cover
5. Gathering common extension points from
existing XLIFF Tools as a guide for 2.0 features (Bryan, Thomas)
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201101/msg00007.html)
- Lucia has taken over Micah's matrix
- David F is investigating funding for XLIFF tools page
6. XLIFF Spec in XLIFF (Lucia)
7. International Cloud Symposium: The intersection of policies,
standards and best practices for robust trusted public
sector cloud deployments.”
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00029.html)
a. The Symposium will be held October 10-13 in Slough, United Kingdom (near London).
b. OASIS encourages us to conduct a F2F
5/ XLIFF 2.0 (http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF2.0/FeatureTracking)
1. XLIFF 2.0 Core (note: per our decision that we will
define feature, and then vote if they
are core or module, I've moved all feature
into the modules category for now, except
segmentation which we identified as core -
though I need to locate the vote to
confirm this)
a. Segmentation - Yves, et al.
begin: (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201104/msg00005.html)
most recent (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201104/msg00034.html)
b. Philosophy of core vs. modules - David W.
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201104/msg00020.html)
and
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00024.html)
2. XLIFF 2.0 Modules
a. Rodolfo's latest schema with examples and two optional modules
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00023.html)
b. Compliance - Rodolfo, Yves
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201104/msg00031.html)
- note, shall we table compliance until we begin Conformance criteria discussion?
c. Crossover aligned segments - Yves
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201105/msg00038.html)
d. Feedback from OpenTM2 XLIFF interoperability enhancements (Andrew Pimlott)
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-comment/201105/msg00000.html)
3. XLIFF 2.0 Attributes - Rodolfo
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201104/msg00056.html)
- note, do we want attributes to be discussed at this level?
or should they be discussed under 1. and 2. ?
a. Translation status values for 2.0 - Yves
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201104/msg00058.html)
4. Conformance criteria
5. Review items approved in section 1 (http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF2.0/FeatureTracking)
(we now have 4 approved new features and 16 proposed features to be evaluated)
6/ Charter
1. The current charter is here: (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xliff/charter.php)
2. David F. offered to do a first draft
7/ New Business
==========
Minutes:
==========
Attendance:
| Meeting Statistics |
| Quorum rule |
51% of voting members |
| Achieved quorum |
true |
| Counts toward voter eligibility |
true |
| Individual Attendance |
Members: 11 of 37 (29%)
Voting Members: 9 of 10 (90%) (used for quorum calculation)
|
| Company Attendance |
Companies: 8 of 21 (38%)
Voting Companies: 8 of 8 (100%)
|