Description: 1/ Call one of the FreeConferenceCall phone numbers:
US: (712) 432-1600
US: (605) 772-3100
Austria: 0820 4000 1552
Belgium: 070 35 9974
France: 0826 100 256
Germany: 01805 00 76 09
Ireland: 0818 270 021
Italy: 848 390 156
Netherlands: 0870 001 920
Spain: 902 886025
Switzerland: 0848 560 179
UK: 0870 35 204 74
2/ Enter the Participant Access Code: 737043#
==========
Agenda: 1/ Roll call
2/ Approve previous meeting minutes:
Accept, reject, or amend. (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200903/msg00010.html)
3/ XLIFF / TMX Cooperation
A. Unifying XLIFF inline element(s) with TMX's new proposal for inline element(s)
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200903/msg00006.html) (Christian)
Possible dimensions which could show up in the requirements could be:
1. general scope
2. relationship to a namespace
3. backwards compatibility with existing namespaces
4. abstract markup proposal
5. specific markup proposal
Additional points raised by Yves
B. Needs for Content Markup (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200903/msg00025.html)
C. Datatype (with reply from Rodolfo)
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200903/msg00024.html)
D. Character Normalization (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200903/msg00023.html)
E. Characters Not Allowed in XML (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200903/msg00022.html)
F. PUA Characters (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200903/msg00021.html)
G. Directionality (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200903/msg00020.html)
H. Inline Code Flags (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200903/msg00019.html)
4/ Seg-source and source differences (Yves, Rodolfo, Christian)
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200903/msg00011.html)
5/ Reference Implementation (Yves, Christian)
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200903/msg00013.html)
6/ TC charter update
(http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xliff/charter.php)
A. Mary outlined the criteria for updating the charter:
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200806/msg00004.html)
B. Tony will draft a charter update.
7/ Conformance section
A. XLIFF 1.2.1
B. XLIFF 2.0
8/ Readiness for a vote on XLIFF 1.2.1 as a committee draft
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200903/msg00001.html)
- warm thanks to Rodolfo for this great work!
- Conformance section requirement (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200903/msg00000.html)
- Approve Eric's representation guide (ICU Resource Bundle)
9/ Promoting XLIFF (Peter, David F.)
10/ "XLIFF 2.0 will be complete when _______"
There are two camps for filling in the blank
A. Set a calendar goal. All items that are complete and approved by the
TC make it into XLIFF 2.0 - All others need to wait for the "next train,"
i.e., XLIFF 2.X or XLIFF 3. Special care needs to be taken to define
doneness and ensure no dependency issues between items.
And "XLIFF 2.0 is complete on set date of *Month/Day/Year*"
- or -
B. Define a finite set of XLIFF 2.0 items. Set a cutoff date for adding items.
The list of accepted items becomes our requirements document.
And "XLIFF 2.0 is complete when items 1 through X are finished"
(some in this camp see our current set of goals, as is, as that
finite list)
11/ XLIFF 2.0 Items (http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF2.0/FeatureTracking)
Note: Much gratitude to Asgeir for consolidating our XLIFF 2.0 Items
Note: This will serve as our tracking page for XLIFF 2.0. If any items were accidentally dropped in the conversion, please add them here
Note: We will (I think) want to move the remaining items from here (http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF2.0)
under the heading of "Content that is not yet migrated to tracking page"
12/ Reports from liaisons involved with other standards groups:
A. W3C i18n
B. Oscar
C. LRC
D. OASIS DITA Translation Subcommittee
E. OAXAL
13/ New Business
+++++++++++++++++++++++
==========
Minutes: Present: David Filip, Arle Lommel, Magnus Martikainen, Bryan Schnabel, Rodolfo Raya, Christian Lieske, Asgeir Firmannsson.
Regrets: Tony, Yves, Doug
Asgeir moved to accept previous meeting minutes. Rodolfo seconded and none opposed.
Arle Lommel, chair of LISA’s OSCAR joined the TC.
Bryan introduced the subject of compatibility with TMX 2.0. Arle mentioned that in last OSCAR call the consensus was to work together with the XLIFF TC, extending potential agreements beyond inline markup considerations. Bryan summarized the items related to TMX listed on the agenda. Christian mentioned that he would like to know the answers from OSCAR to the comments submitted by the XLIFF TC. The public review period for TMX 2.0 end on April 10, so there is time for submitting a document to OSCAR with official suggestions from the XLIFF TC. The possibility of creating a common namespace for inline markup to be used by XLIFF and TMX was discussed. Christian’s idea of defining common goals for XLIFF and TMX was analyzed and may be implemented. Bryan will try to summarize the items discussed and start an email thread for moving forward.
Call dismissed.
==========
Attendance:
| Meeting Statistics |
| Quorum rule |
51% of voting members |
| Achieved quorum |
true |
| Counts toward voter eligibility |
true |
| Individual Attendance |
Members: 7 of 37 (18%)
Voting Members: 5 of 9 (55%) (used for quorum calculation)
|
| Company Attendance |
Companies: 7 of 26 (26%)
Voting Companies: 5 of 9 (55%)
|