Description:
Please join my meeting.
https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/905529225
Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended. Or, call in using your telephone.
France: +33 (0) 182 880 780
Germany: +49 (0) 892 2061 159
Spain: +34 911 23 0850
Sweden: +46 (0) 852 500 612
United Kingdom: +44 (0) 203 535 0611
United States: +1 (773) 945-1031
Access Code: 905-529-225
Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting
Meeting ID: 905-529-225
==========
Agenda:
1/ Roll call
2/ Approve Tuesday, 21 February 2012 meeting minutes:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201202/msg00071.html
3/ Sub Committee Reports
1. Inline text (Yves)
2. XLIFF Promotion and Liaison SC Charter (David)
a. New SotA questionnaire design will be circulated after SC today for 5 business days review
i Is the new design to be approved at SC or TC level?
ii Next step is to set up a kavi approval ballot at appropriate level
iii Aim is to start collecting new data set before the end of March
b. Proposal to form official liaison with MultilingualWeb-LT
i Arle volunteered to act as XLIFF TC liaison in the said W3C group
ii David is Co-Chair of the said WG, and was appointed XLIFF TC liaison, unless there are XLIFF TC objections.
iii The other possible candidate would be Yves, who was not present at the SC which addressed this liaison
iv Can we follow up with kavi TC ballot or do we need more discussion on this?
c. SC recommendation: SC was discussing how to best move from feature driven to calendar driven paradigm. Bryan's baseline calculating exercise is good start. The steps SC proposes are as follows:
i Evaluate the time needed.
ii Allow newcomers time enough to add their features.
iii Freeze and recalculate
iv Set calendar driven deadline
d. SC asks for extension of its mandate's scope: (Based on talking to IN! and evaluating other standardization activities such as ULI) SC determined need for explicit XLIFF profiling policy common for both 1.2 and 2.0. The SC started discussion on this. SC asks EITHER to be mandated to work on the policy OR adding this policy as a business item on the TC agenda
Note: Listing items from email threads between meetings. But any feature/issue may be brought to the floor.
a. Overloaded
c. Attributes for HTML at-a-glance feature http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201202/msg00072.html
d. Attributes for translation candidates http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201202/msg00082.html
e. Unified XML schema for XLIFF 2.0 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201202/msg00099.html
Need new owners, or to dismiss the following un-owned proposals:
(T2) Document-centric Localisation http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF2.0/FeatureTracking#XLIFF2.0.2BAC8-Feature.2BAC8-DocumentCentricLocalisation.A.28T2.29Document-centricLocalisation
(T5) XLIFF as a Project Model http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF2.0/FeatureTracking#XLIFF2.0.2BAC8-Feature.2BAC8-ProjectModel.A.28T5.29XLIFFasaProjectModel
(T10) Terminology Markup http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF2.0/FeatureTracking#XLIFF2.0.2BAC8-Feature.2BAC8-TerminologyMarkup.A.28T10.29TerminologyMarkup
1. XLIFF 2.0 Technical work
3. Conformance criteria
5/ Current XLIFF business
Note: Moved some items to P & L SC; some remaining things need TC approval to move
1. XLIFF and TM, Glossary, Segmentation Rules (Christian)
- - Suggested we need to start thread evaluating TAUS survey
2. Using other standards vs. adding XLIFF modules
(Arle, David W., Yves, Helena, . . .)
Note: shall we move this to Technical Issues for XLIFF 2.0 wiki page
6/ New Business
==========
Minutes:
==========
Attendance:
| Meeting Statistics |
| Quorum rule |
51% of voting members
|
| Achieved quorum |
yes |
| Individual Attendance |
Contributing Members: 20 of 33 (60%)
Voting Members: 12 of 14 (85%) (used for quorum calculation)
|
| Company Attendance |
Contributing Companies: 12 of 19 (63%)
Voting Companies: 10 of 11 (90%)
|