XLIFF TC Call

Please get the dial in information from our private Action Item here:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/members/action_item.php?action_item_id=3663

I. Admin

  A. Approved (via mailing list) meeting minutes for 15-August, 2017

https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201708/msg00068.html

  B. XLIFF V2.1 Committee Specification 01 published by the XLIFF TC

https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201709/msg00002.html

II. As specified earlier, let's focus on the end game plan.

III. SOU request
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201708/msg00076.html

IV. Sub Committee Report (0:45 - 0:55)

V.  Current and New Business (0:55 -

I. Admin

Attendance: DavidF, Tom, Yves, Lucia.

Regrets: Bryan, Felix, Souroush.

A. Minutes from 5th Sep to be approved

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/email/archives/201709/msg00005.html

Y: I second.

[no dissent]

Df: Minutes approved.   

B. XLIFF V2.1 Committee Specification 01 published by the XLIFF TC

https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201709/msg00002.html

II. As specified earlier, let's focus on the end game plan.

III. SOU request
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201708/msg00076.html

Df: We cannot progress to Candidate OASIS standard without three SOUs, and one of them must be an OASIS organizational member.

L: We have received two SOUs, I need to tell the respondents by email that they need to send it to the TC. (Action item)

Df: Yves, can you tell us what you actually implemented?

Y: Some of the ITS module (text analysis, terminology, Loc quality issue, mt confidence, provenance…).

Df: that is great. We only need now one  more SOU from an organizational member.

Df: Lucia, did you receive any email or request?

L: No, I didn’t

Df: I am going to reach SDL to have the SOU. Trinity-ADAPT is an organizational member, the FREME project is hosted there.

Df: The OASIS level voting process has changed. It is now basically a call for dissent.

IV. Sub Committee Report (0:45 - 0:55)

Df: Subcommittee meeting dealt with the symposium organization. We notified accepted speakers.  [David explains the proposals]

Df: The TBX revision progresses.

Df: TAPPIC. The working group 3 in track 1 would be the most relevant for us. Extracting and merging XLIFF. Yves I think you are on that working group.

Y: I think I am in all of them (working groups). But I do not know if I will be able to be active in all of them.

Df: I think it would be very important to have OKAPI in that working group. I think xliff 2.0 is starting to being used in extracting merging in CMSs.

V. Current and New Business (0:55 –

Df: Meeting adjourned.