Description:
During the Implementer Sharing Sessions from 10:30 –noon and 1:00-2:00 PM, courts and solution providers (both OASIS members and non-members) will be invited to share their suggestions for future versions of the ECF specifications.
==========
Agenda:
Time Topic Subtopic Discussion Lead
9:00 – 9:15am Welcome and Introductions Jim Cabral
9:15 - 9:30am CTC events “E-filing and Web Services”, October 4, 4pm Jim Harris
“Paper on demand /E-filing Solution Sharing Session”, October 5, 7am Jim Harris
9:30 – 10:30am LegalXML updates Member Section and Steering Committee Robert O’Brien
New LegalXML committees (LegalRuleML, ParliamentXML) Monica Palmirani
Electronic discovery (e.g., EDRM.net) Jim Cabral
10:30am - noon Feedback from ECF implementers and new use cases US bankruptcy and other federal courts Jim Cabral
Los Angeles County (non-court filings) Jerry Floyd
Arizona Courts Jim Price
Intresys Tania Wasser
Green Filing George Knecht
Noon – 1:00pm LUNCH (on your own)
1:00 – 2:00pm Feedback from ECF implementers and new use cases Utah Courts Ron Bowmaster
Tybera Dallas Powell
URL Integration Joe Mierwa
2:00 – 2:30pm NIEM updates NIEM National Training Event Jim Cabral
LEXS 3.1/4.0 Jim Cabral
XSTF, NIEM 3.0 Robin Gibson
CYFS domain Di Graski
2:30 – 4:00pm Future planning ECF core specifications Jim Cabral
ECF MQ and other SIP specifications Jim Cabral
Outreach opportunities and training materials Jim Harris
ECF TC Jim Cabral
LegalXML Member Section Robert O’Brien
Meeting scheduling Jim Cabral
4:00 – 5:00pm TC conference call Call-in number: 800-503-2899
Access code: 3174563#
Optional Chat/Queue: http://webconf.soaphub.org/conf/room/oasis-ecf
Jim Cabral
==========
Minutes:
==========
Attendance:
Meeting Statistics |
Quorum rule |
51% of voting members
|
Achieved quorum |
yes |
Individual Attendance |
Observing Members: 3 of 7 (42%) Contributing Members: 1 of 18 (5%) Voting Members: 0 of 8 (0%) (used for quorum calculation)
|
Company Attendance |
Observing Companies: 3 of 3 (100%) Contributing Companies: 1 of 10 (10%) Voting Companies: 0 of 7 (0%)
|