Profile

Contact Details

Ribbons

Badges

Timothy Bennett


Contributions

1 to 5 of 29 total
Posted By Timothy Bennett 05-09-2013 16:55
Found In Egroup: OASIS ebXML Messaging Services TC
\ view thread
Ok... so in this sense, it's not much different than the alternative pull authorization explicitly detailed in section 3.3 of the AS4 spec that uses the client authentication of a pull request over HTTPs. In the same way, the transport layer is providing the authentication and the MSH layer "trusts" ...
Posted By Timothy Bennett 05-09-2013 15:05
Found In Egroup: OASIS ebXML Messaging Services TC
\ view thread
I'm guessing, Makesh, that implementation occurs at the HTTP transport layer, correct? Not at the AS4 message processing layer, right? You are talking about HTTP Basic Auth, right? Theo's question is really about the AS4 MSH use case for the ebHandler receiving a Pull Request with no WSSE token on the ...
Posted By Timothy Bennett 04-23-2013 15:02
Found In Egroup: OASIS ebXML Messaging Services TC
\ view thread
Would like to just echo Theo's request. This has come up right out of the gate for the Interop Test we have just kicked off. In fact, with the interop test kicking off, the TC might expect a number of clarifications to be raised in the coming days and weeks.
Posted By Timothy Bennett 11-28-2012 20:40
Found In Egroup: OASIS ebXML Messaging Services TC
\ view thread
Turns out that X509 signatures are optional for 4 of the 5 usage profiles in the SuperStream draft spec, so perhaps the definition of NRR in that context takes on meaning not dependent on signed messages. On 11/28/2012 1:53 PM, Jacques Durand wrote: Right for Section 5.1.8 , although the statement in ...