Profile

Hi David Am Freitag, den 30.03.2007, 09:07 -0700 schrieb David RR Webber (XML): > Sacha, > > In your scenario - the SMEs only have issues receiving ebXML msgs - > not sending. also sending if you want to send but the receiver is down. > > Also - now with the new staged delivery "pull" ...

Hi ebMS Team One question I have for the TC: "Is SMTP supported as a first class transport protocol in ebMS 3.0"? If not than I can see a problem for two SME's which do not have an always on HTTP server. With ebMS 2.0 an SME can always use SMTP to make sure he can go online, send the ebXML ...

Hi Jacques Am Dienstag, den 13.02.2007, 16:46 -0800 schrieb Durand, Jacques R.: > Sacha: > > If we are absolutely confident that no use case that requires a > different security order is worth supporting, then the expected order > can be required as in ebMS2. I mixed them up in my email as ...

Am Mittwoch, den 14.02.2007, 16:20 -0700 schrieb Dale Moberg: > Sacha Schlegel wrote: > > In this discussion, signature and encryption were identified as two key > functions, and the order in which they occur. It was noted that ebMS 3.0 > no longer specifies the default configuration as was defined ...

Dear ebMS group In todays ebXML CPPA conference call Dale talked about the ongoings in ebMS 3.0 and what ebCPPA will have to accommodate to align with ebMS 3.0. One question was formed around "given the diversity of deployment environments, what is a easy way to configure an ebMS 3.0 with a ...