Profile

In reviewing the proposal, I was slightly concerned by the decision to use target_modified as a required property when specifying the relationship from the new language-content object to the STIX object that it provides a translation for. All other relationships in STIX 2.0 use only an ID. With STIX ...

+1 It seems like we can make it easy to refer to sections in one consolidated specification and enable the best of both worlds here. I don’t see CWE, CAPEC, or CVE as relevant to this conversation. I cannot say anything one way or the other about CVRF or CIQ. Thanks, ...

+1 Thanks for thinking through the underlying issues that might be making it so hard to achieve consensus. I completely agree that by trying to develop a messaging standard and a document standard in one effort is a significant source of frustration for this group. This is how I have thought about this ...

The sightings conversation has historically suffered from a lack of shared understand of the sightings use cases and an attempt to address all the related sightings use cases with one complex model that does not really satisfy any single use case very well. I guess I am a fan of a bottom up approach ...