Profile

Hi all, In my usage of the grammar files listed on the spec ( http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/csprd01/part3-all-inclusive/dita-v1.3-csprd01-part3-all-inclusive-grammars.zip ), I came across this issue. It seems that the base/catalog.xml file contains entries only for xml.xsd and ditaarch.xsd, ...

The first point I get from this blogpost is that XML is not easy enough to author in a text editor, while Markdown is pretty easy to work with. And I can totally relate to that. Second point is that working with Markdown is easier than working with XML in an XML editor, although that is an unfair comparison ...

Hi all, After yesterday’s call I have some more thoughts on the subjects we talked about. First of all, the discussion of the table model: simpletable vs constrained CALS table model. You can argue that a table is like svg or mathml, and a simpler model like with LW DITA doesn’t have to mean ...

The call we had on Monday got me thinking about the DITA compatibility. Should it be possible to switch to the full DITA by just switching the doctype? What is the goal of this subcommittee? To create the best possible subset of DITA? Or to create something that borrows the best concepts from DITA and ...

What is the TC statement on the use of these updated files for DITA 1.2? Should tool vendors pick up these files or stick to the files linked in the spec? On 07/04/15 20:42, "Eliot Kimber" wrote: >Note that these changes do not affect the DTDs, only the XSDs, RNGs, and >RNCs. The DTD files were always ...