Profile

I think it would be a great shame not to include change tracking of RDF in the specification. Even if the inclusion lists it as an "optional" area that applications might like to implement. Not covering RDF in the specification may well lead to cases where applications use their own model for such functionality ...

Hi, One area which after initial discussion there seems to be no opposition to having is change tracking on the RDF for the ODF document. http://markmail.org/message/4t6zlmiieno2g7on IMHO this is a very important feature to have as a change tracked content.xml really wants changes to the RDF associated ...

On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:49 -0600, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:42 -0600, monkeyiq wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:22 -0600, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:12 -0600, monkeyiq wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 23:53 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote: ...

On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:22 -0600, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:12 -0600, monkeyiq wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 23:53 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > > > monkeyiq wrote about ECT: > > > > I find this an extremely critical issue has it means that users of > > > > change tracking ...