Profile

Duane Nickull wrote: > On the other hand, OASIS is an organization that has to pay bills and > operate with an impartial and balanced set of rules. They cannot pay their > bills with contributions and good will alone. They do need $$. Absolutely. In addition, OASIS must also have rules to ensure ...

Does everyone feel that there's no need to include an algorithm that is not from the SHA family? If I'm alone in thinking we should include WHIRLPOOL in case SHA is broken 10 years from now, I won't put up a fuss. Best, Daniel. On Fri, 2006-08-12 at 11:50 +0100, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany ...

On Tue, 2006-28-11 at 14:04 -0500, Patrick Durusau wrote: > Not exactly. > > If the file associations are not editable by the user, limiting opening > of the file to the use of an ODF compliant application and they are > denied access to a DOS command window (with edit or something similar) ...

On Tue, 2006-28-11 at 16:42 +0100, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote: > actually, the "password" we are talking about do not belong to a > security feature like digital signatures or encryption, but are only > passwords that an office application user interface may request before ...

On Tue, 2006-28-11 at 06:29 -0500, Patrick Durusau wrote: > Does anyone know if the list of hash functions posted by Florian > (thanks!) would be considered sufficient by government agencies? Or common? I'm no expert, but I think that for the USA we are looking at NIST (ie. SHA1, SHA256, SHA384, ...