Profile

On today's call we talked briefly about erratas and minor editorial changes. If I understand our current state, we today voted to push wd16 out the door and to start the process of making it our proposed oasis v1.0 spec. It seems to me that we can deal with these minor edits if we simply follow the oasis ...

Its just the pattern I'm used to. To me usually a major version number change implies BIG changes and that usually means breaking changes. Not a hard rule though. :-) thanks -Doug ________________________________________________________ STSM Standards Architect IBM Software Group (919) ...

Paul, when I said let's talk next week it was to continue the discussion via a better means of communication than email and to try to understand why we're even having this thread at all. Its not because I wanted to resolve the issue of what to call the next rev of the spec prematurely. Let's ...

I would actually prefer a version-less title because of the implications that including 'v2' in there will mean to people - mainly a set of breaking changes. Or maybe I'm reading too much into presence of these docs all together and all we really care about is the new template and the editors will make ...

tosca-chairs, during the call on Thursday we talked a lot of v2 activities and perhaps I should have given the terminology more consideration (or I apologize if this was discussed during the call and I missed it) but I was interpreting the talks to really be about v.next - meaning "whatever we do next". ...