Profile

Sorry for not replying Toby. I'd be happy to meet some time soon. Otherwise I agree we should continue as-is. On 4/21/21 17:36, Considine, Toby wrote: 3 out of 4 members of this TC have indicated that we * may * get some more work soon. No members of the TC have indicated when they would like to meet ...

I'd also support continuing - I'm available for a meeting On 1/22/21 12:13, William Cox wrote: I support continuing. Do we do this with a TC meeting in February? Deadline is end of February. Thanks! bill On 1/21/21 3:05 PM, Michael Douglass wrote: It might make sense to look at the current state of specifications ...

It might make sense to look at the current state of specifications and the calendar world. I recall there being some interest in vpoll and we now have a new json spec for calendars (jscalendar). On 1/21/21 14:34, Considine, Toby wrote: Any other opinions? We must meet to affirmatively vote to keep this ...

jmap is a protocol - it's actually developed by fastmail as a replacement for iMap and they're working through getting it re-specified as an rfc. In parallel we (calconnect) are starting work on jmap for calendars. Way back of course we started on a CalWS-REST which only got to a very basic level. JsCalendar ...

Happy not to have a meeting today. On 10/9/15 10:45, William Cox wrote: Can we plan ahead for our next meeting? For October 23 I'd like to dive into the minimal PIM proposal and Streams. Thanks! bill -- *William Cox* Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com ...