Profile

Should probably look to see if there are any deprecated functions as well as keeping an eye on XSL 2.0 requirements. I did a quick scan and a few deprecated features in 1.1. Should probably make sure we are represented during the 2.0 requirements process to avoid any deprecations of things paramount ...

Has anyone documented mapping the Office metadata to other popular formats such as XMP and MS Office? Such a matrix might be useful for those who actually have to work with metadata on large scale systems. Duane On 4/14/09 2:06 AM, "Michael Stahl" wrote: hi Patrick, ...

Both HTML and XML have well defined conformance. XML is very terse and the instructions to throw errors and suspend parsing are unambiguous. Re:HTML, the reality is that there are the formal standards, but then extensions and modifications by browser vendors. W3 has a conformance checker online ...

Perhaps this is out of line, but I would also like to know forwards/backwards conformance preservation guidelines. I presume that everyone would want to to be forwards and backwards compatible (once we figure out Dennis’s answer below). Duane On 08/02/09 8:22 PM, "Dennis E. Hamilton" ...

All extensions and root components should be required to have namespaces to avoid collisions IMHO.