Profile

Dear TC, The design decision with respect to "related strings" in the Plural, Gender, and Select Module is to represent their "relatedness" via inclusion in a single "unit" element. 1 0, 2~16, 102, 1002 20~35, 100, 1000, 10000, 100000 ...

Dear TC, In several places (e.g., "4.9.6.1 Plural") the document mentions a "compact form (non-XLIFF)". Example: unit @switch(plural:file_count) segment "You deleted no files." @case(0) segment "You deleted one file." @case(1) segment "You deleted files." @case(other) ...

Dear TC, In the context of the new Plural, Gender, and Select Module several allowed selector keywords are mentioned in the document: „Plural: the predefined keywords in this order: zero, one, two, few, many, other"„Gender: followed by the predefined keywords in this order: feminine, ...

Dear TC, It would be great if the rationale for removal of the Change Tracking Extension could be made explicit in the document. The rationale could for example be valuable knowledge for commenting on other extensions. Best regards, Christian

Dear TC, While I can understand the rationale behind the decision to present XLIFF 2.2 in two separate documents, I sense that the separation creates difficulties to compare XLIFF 2.1 and XLIFF 2.2. on a textual level. I wonder if the TC could facilitate the review of textual differences ...