Profile

On 8/23/07, Thomas Zander wrote: On Thursday 23 August 2007 17:45:58 Florian Reuter wrote: > we made incompatible changes to the numbering anyway. So I see no > reason why we can't change it. what does the topic of headers have to do with the topic of lists ? The TC already broke compatibility ...

Thank you, Uri. On 8/23/07, Uri Resnitzky wrote: Marbux, Have a look in the wiki: http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument_v1%2e2_Action_Items The Digital Signature Proposal is listed under "Approved Proposals" which is separate from the "Proposal integrated into the specification ...

On 8/23/07, Dave Pawson wrote: On 23/08/07, Michael Brauer wrote: > However, simply changing the name would have the impact that this > feature would not be understood by ODF 1.1 applications any more, and > that the ODF 1.2 specification would not define what the meaning of this > attribute ...

On 8/23/07, Michael Brauer wrote: They are actually called "embedded objects" or just "objects" in the ODF specification, so everything should be fine here. Malte, is my understanding correct that you propose to add the version attribute we have for the content, style, meta and setting streams ...

On 8/13/07, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: On 8/13/07, marbux wrote: > Why did you think Sun is so determined to retain discretion to destroy > metadata xml:id atttributes? First, this is of course a particularly biased interpretation of the language of the metadata proposal. So what is a use ...