Profile

Dear Editors, one question you might have already considered. In OData Atom format [1], apparently the IDs of all structural / navigation properties are flattened into a single namespace (the OData Data Namespace). Is there any reason for this? E.g. in section 5.1.7.1 "The rel attribute of an atom:link ...

Hello Barbara, Ram, as I do not plan to attend all the meetings (e.g., probably I'll skip the next one), I think that "persistent non voting member" better fits my way of partecipating at this TC. Could you please update my status to that one? Thank you very much, Giovanni ----- Messaggio inoltrato da ...

Dear Stefan, option B) is ok with me. Best Regards, Giovanni Def. Quota Stefan Drees : Dear Giovanni, based on the result from discussion during meeting#3 of OData TC (below under details the snippet from the minutes) and the fact that there was no subsequent discussion in this regard on the mailing ...

Hello Ashok, Uhmm... well, to my understanding the Direct Mapping ( http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb-direct-mapping/ ) - as opposite to R2RML - does more than producing a schema It also produces RDF-encoded "facts" (A-boxes in DL) describing the acutual tuples into the database. Doing so it produces also URIRefs ...

Hello, W3C has recently proposed two recommendations ("direct mapping" and "R2RML") to map database entries into URIs (better URIRefs). link: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/ "In the direct mapping of a database the [URIrefs] directly reflects the names of database schema elements, and neither structure ...