Profile

Hi Bret and Allan, Agreeing with both of you, I will be happy to help with the terminology content although I may be tied up this afternoon. I suppose we should urge anyone with an opposing opinion re/ this matter to voice it as soon as possible. My thanks, John

Hi Allan, My thought was a singular doc to be shared as an input to multiple specs. That said it would have to be the case that, although there may be opinions resulting in multiple approaches, that there would still need to be agreement by the TC upon a single playbook terminology. Otherwise I suppose ...

Recently a minor, avoidable concern caused by a need to reconcile versions of the Terminology section across multiple documents led to the question of whether that content should be represented singly in a committee note. I'd like to support and open to further discussion this option in an effort to ...

In contemplation of discussion surrounding playbooks being offered both as commercial products and as freely shared 'formulary', I began to consider the need to protect access to open playbooks while protecting the commercial rights of others. To me the CACAO effort has exceeded the content of previous ...