MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
xacml message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] Vote for XACML F2F Date, Location, and Duration...
Great! Now, any clue about where to stay in Milan?
Cheers,
-Polar
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Carlisle Adams wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's Monday morning, the votes are in, and here are the results...
>
> Firstly, we can trim down the choices somewhat:
> - nobody seems to want to meet in San Francisco on the Saturday morning (it
> received no votes, although Bill indicated that it would be as acceptable to
> him as any of the other 2.5-day options), so the SF slot is W(pm)TF
> - those voting for Milan either indicated no preference in days or chose
> (b) (the only exception was Simon, who chose (a), but I'm assuming he would
> not be opposed to (b)), so the Milan slot is MTW(am)
>
> Actual votes:
> - Milan: Anne, Ernesto, Michiharu, Pierangela, Bill, Don, Polar, Simon
> (8)
> - SF: Anne, Ken, Michiharu, Bill (4)
>
> Extra information:
> - I just spoke with Hal on the phone and he indicated that he could
> probably attend either location, though he had a slight preference for
> California (he was on vacation all last week and so was not able to cast a
> vote in time)
> - Tim indicated to me that Entrust would send one person to Milan but could
> conceivably send two to SF
> - I assume that Don, Polar, and Simon (who all voted for Milan) could also
> go to SF if the meeting was there
>
> Totals:
> - with the extra information above, we have the following numbers
> - Milan: Anne, Ernesto, Michiharu, Pierangela, Bill, Don, Polar, Simon,
> [Hal, 1-from-Entrust] (total = 10)
> - SF: Anne, Ken, Michiharu, Bill, [Hal, Don, Polar, Simon, Carlisle,
> Tim] (total = 10)
>
> Conclusion:
> - potentially 10 people at either location, which would be quorum
> - actual votes cast favoured Milan, and I did say that the most votes would
> win
> - therefore, Milan is the winner!
>
> Next F2F date, location, and duration:
> - {Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday morning}, April 22-24, 2002, University of
> Milan, Italy.
>
>
> Thanks to everyone for your participation!
>
> Carlisle.
>
> P.S., If anyone has serious objections my reasoning above, get them out now
> because those wanting 21-day advance bookings for cheaper fares will
> probably need to book today...
>
>
> > ----------
> > From: Carlisle Adams[SMTP:carlisle.adams@entrust.com]
> > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:02 PM
> > To: xacml list; 'bill parducci'
> > Subject: [xacml] Vote for XACML F2F Date, Location, and Duration...
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Apologies for not getting this out earlier. I had agreed to send this
> > after our TC concall last Thursday, but then was tied up the rest of that
> > day and was traveling all day Friday.
> >
> > ----------
> > From: bill parducci[SMTP:bill@parducci.net]
> > Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 10:18 PM
> > To: xacml list
> > Subject: [xacml] next f2f
> >
> > is there a timeline and/or mechanism for determining when and where
> > the
> > next f2f will occur? are we waiting for the next all-hands meeting?
> > voting via e-mail?
> >
> >
> > Yes, I'm calling for an e-mail vote which will close first thing Monday
> > morning (April 1st). That is, I'll count whatever's in my in-box when I
> > get into work on Monday morning. Votes should be sent to the list as a
> > response to this message.
> >
> > There are a couple of things on which to vote.
> >
> > 1) Date and Location. The choices are as follows (pick one):
> > a) Mon.-Tue., April 22-23 in Milan, Italy (hosted by Pierangela and
> > Ernesto at U. Milan)
> > b) Thu.-Fri., April 25-26 in San Francisco, USA (hosted by Ken
> > Yagen at CrossLogix)
> > c) either choice is acceptable
> > d) I cannot attend either choice
> >
> > 2) Duration. There has been a proposal to add an extra half day to the
> > meeting. The choices are as follows (pick one):
> >
> > a) MILAN: Mon. afternoon, Tue. full day, Wed. full day
> > b) MILAN: Mon. full day, Tue. full day, Wed morning
> > c) SF: Wed. afternoon, Thu. full day, Fri. full day
> > d) SF: Thu. full day, Fri. full day, Sat. morning
> > e) forget about the extra half day; two full days is enough
> >
> > The largest number of votes on each item wins.
> >
> > Our face-to-face meetings have been well-attended and very productive so
> > far; hopefully, we can continue this tradition.
> >
> > Carlisle.
> >
> >
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC