================================================================ Are people comfortable with my sending the following response to John Merrells (and any others that reference older versions of the specification)? John, Thank you for submitting your comments. The public review of XACML 1.0 is being held with respect to XACML 1.0, and not with respect to the 18f draft. We fixed a number of inconsistencies between the two versions and removed some functionality (including that described by your comments on ...IsPresent and Qualified... There is a link to XACML 1.0 and the schemas on the XACML TC Web Page at
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xacml/ Anne ================================================================ Also, do people feel we need to send an acknowledgment of receipt of a comment that appears on xacml-comment (prior to our actual response), or is the fact that it appears in the archives sufficient acknowledgment that it has been received? If an acknowledgment is appropriate, how about the following: <Name>, Thank you for submitting your comment titled <subject>. The XACML TC will respond once we have had an opportunity to discuss the comment. Anne -- Anne H. Anderson Email:
Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM Sun Microsystems Laboratories 1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928 Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692