Jim, Thank you for the valuable edits to the draft ECF v.1 Committee Note. Upon review, I found the four following minor corrections that should be made: 1. Pg. 16 of 41 (section 3.12.1), the words “review filing request” were replaced with “RFR”. The proper acronym per section 1.2.2 is “RvFR”. Originally: So, if the ECF v4.01 review filing request was composed as recommended in ECF v4.01, i.e., consisting of a single CoreFilingMessage and an optional PaymentMessage , then theoretically, this review filing request could be understood by an ECF v4.1 ReviewFiling operation. As revised: So, if the [ECF-v4.01] RFR was composed as recommended in [ECF-v4.01] , i.e., consisting of a single CoreFilingMessage and an optional PaymentMessage , then theoretically, this review filing request could be understood by an [ECF-v4.1] ReviewFiling operation. 2. The acronym “RFR” which refers to RecordFilingRequest was inadvertently left out of the Acronyms and Abbreviations table and should be added. This acronym appears (appropriately) on pgs. 13, 14, & 16 of 41. 3. Missing left-square-bracket in 3.4.2 CourtPolicyResponseMessage for the [ECF-WS-SIP-v4.1] reference: 4. Typo – 8.2.1 Providing Clerk Review and Other Results, 9 th paragraph – an extra ‘e’ in ‘multi-episode’: Gay Graham From:
legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org <
legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of James Cabral Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 10:10 PM To:
legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Groups - ECF 4.1 Implementation Guide uploaded CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Submitter's message Revisions throughout to add references and conform to OASIS best practices. Moved example schema and WSDLs in Appendix D to separate files. -- Mr. James Cabral Document Name : ECF 4.1 Implementation Guide Description This document provides implementation guidance for the [ECF-v4.1] and [ECF-WS-SIP-v4.1] specifications. Since the Technical Committee (TC) anticipates that implementors of the v4.1 specifications will have previously implemented prior ECF versions, especially the [ECF-v4.01] and related errata and Web Services SIP specifications. As such, this document will identify differences between the [ECF-v4.1] and [ECF-WS-SIP-v4.1] specifications and immediate prior ECF specifications. Download Latest Revision Public Download Link Submitter : Mr. James Cabral Group : OASIS LegalXML Electronic Court Filing TC Folder : ECF 4.1 Date submitted : 2023-08-23 22:10:08 Revision : 1