Anil, we recommend possible experts on specific standards with some frequency; sometimes as liaisons (in which OASIS retains a role), sometimes as contractors (in which generally we don't). Regards J Sent from my mobile On May 13, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Anil Saldhana <
Anil.Saldhana@redhat.com> wrote: > Hal, > do you know if there is any precedence to hiring standards experts on contractual basis via Oasis? > > I would presume we just have to request someone from the SAML TC who is in Europe to be the liaison. > > Regards, > Anil > > On 05/13/2011 09:48 AM, Peter F Brown wrote: >> OK, >> >> So the main question is: Who feels that they could provide authoritative >> input and advice to the STORK 2 project, particularly with regard to SAML? >> >> If we can get a name, I’d be happy to provide the liaison with the proposed >> STORK 2 consortium to get them on board. But we have to be quick, as the >> deadline is looming…. >> >> >> >> And, yes, there is contractual money involved >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Peter >> >> >> >> From: Laurent M. Liscia [ mailto:
laurent.liscia@oasis-open.org ] >> Sent: Friday, 13 May, 2011 07:25 >> To:
peter@peterfbrown.com >> Cc: 'Anil Saldhana';
hal.lockhart@oracle.com;
Jamie.clark@oasis-open.org >> Subject: Re: FW: STORK 2 >> >> >> >> Thank you Peter (what are you doing up so early?), >> For once I can speak for OASIS since this is a bit of an admin issue. >> OASIS does not possess IPR per se - our members do; that's why, even when we >> are members of another org, we contribute no IPR. But we do have people >> representing us in "consortia" or large-scale projects, such as STORK. I >> think SIENA is exactly like STORK and we have Gershon Janssen and John >> Borras speaking on behalf of OASIS: they provide advice and act as liaisons. >> That is completely feasible. If Anil or Hal care to do the same ... >> Finally it seems to me that the end-game is to get these guys to standardize >> their output in OASIS as per the PEPPOL example. >> >> >> On 5/12/2011 6:00 PM, Peter F Brown wrote: >> >> Hmmm, >> >> Is there anything we can do with this? >> >> Would SAML be interested and/or able to take this up? And how would we >> handle the legal/contractual issues of ‘OASIS’ as an entity joining such a >> consortium… >> >> >> >> From: Alicia Garcia Medina [ mailto:
alicia.garcia@atosresearch.eu ] >> Sent: Wednesday, 11 May, 2011 14:54 >> To: Alicia Garcia Medina;
peter@peterfbrown.com >> Cc: Peter Kustor ; Alberto Crespo Garcia; Ana Maria Piñuela Marcos; >>
miguel.alvarez@mpr.es; Riedl Reinhard;
Neil.Clowes@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk; >> Reinhard Posch >> Subject: RE: STORK 2 >> >> >> >> Dear Peter, >> >> >> >> I have communicated to the core team your interest and some question arises >> since in STORK we do not create standards but support standardisation and we >> would need technical advice on WP4´s SAML profile. >> >> >> >> Could you please indicate to me who would participate as legal entity? Is >> OASIS a legal entity or will it be a company? >> >> >> >> I copy in this message WP4 leader (Miguel) and WP6 co-leaders (Reinhard and >> Neil) so you all can check if this fits in STORK 2.0. >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Alicia. >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Peter F Brown [ mailto:
peter@peterfbrown.com ] >> Sent: martes, 10 de mayo de 2011 19:57 >> To: 'Reinhard Posch' >> Cc: 'Peter Kustor '; Alicia Garcia Medina >> Subject: RE: STORK 2 >> >> >> >> Hi Reinhard, thanks for the prompt reply. >> >> >> >> Indeed, the project is about pilots and with an extended scope as you say, >> with health sector and banking. >> >> Our concern, as OASIS, would be to see what role we can play in facilitating >> the development of new – or greater take-up of existing – standards in this >> project. As you know, we have a new TC set up to pursue work for PEPPOL (the >> OASIS BDX TC) that will hopefully provide a durable standard beyond the >> lifetime of that large-scale pilot – so the main question is: has STORK >> identified a “gap in the market†of IDM standards that needs to be filled? >> If the answer is yes, then our participation could be helpful; if no, then >> it would be a different issue. >> >> >> >> All the best, >> >> Peter >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Reinhard Posch [ mailto:
reinhard.posch@cio.gv.at ] >> Sent: Monday, 09 May, 2011 21:34 >> To:
peter@peterfbrown.com >> Cc: Peter Kustor >> Subject: Re: STORK 2 >> >> >> >> .. indeed June 1st is very near. On the question of technicality of joining >> this late >> >> Alicia Garcia Medina<
alicia.garcia@atosresearch.eu> from ATOS could give >> >> you more details. >> >> Then it would come to what is OASIS bringing to the pilots. It is pilots - >> having >> >> said this I mean that it is about interoperability of existing eID of Member >> States >> >> also with flavors like using them in the private sector like banks and heath >> care. >> >> >> >> Was nice to hear from you >> >> Reinhard >> >> >> >> >> >> Am 10.05.2011 um 01:40 schrieb Peter F Brown: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I was talking last week in Brussels with Jean-Francois Junger at the >> European Commission and he mentioned the current CfP for the next phase of >> STORK. >> >> >> >> He suggested that OASIS, as a standards organisation active in IDM, ought to >> consider joining the proposed new consortium, and help with the delivery of >> standards to be used in the STORK. >> >> >> >> Any thoughts on the matter? Is it realistic, given that the deadline is 1st >> June? >> >> >> >> Best regards from (not so sunny) Los Angeles >> >> >> >> Peter >> >> >> >> Peter F Brown >> >> Independent Consultant >> >> <image001.png> >> >> Transforming our Relationships with Information Technologies >> >> <x-msg://101/www.peterfbrown.com>
www.peterfbrown.com >> >> P.O. Box 49719, Los Angeles, CA 90049, USA >> >> Tel: +1.310.694.227