OASIS IDtrust Steering Committee

 View Only
  • 1.  Motion for your consideration

    Posted 12-02-2011 21:03
    Since I tend to be more of a ruminant than
    an improvisational type, I thought I'd put together a few thoughts before
    the meeting next week, and allow folks to think about it between now and
    then.  At that time, my plan is to bring it forward as a motion.  So
    this should either be an agenda item, or we need to leave some time for
    AOB.

    Motion:        
           Change the name of the “IDtrust” member
    section to the “Identity, Trust and the Cloud” member section

    Rationale:      
     As a steering committee, we have discussed ways to better
    harness the energies around cloud computing.  Absent a concrete proposal,
    we have general consensus that such energies exist, that they are likely
    to persist, and that attracting relevant standards activities to OASIS
    would benefit all.  This motion is an attempt to solidify that general
    consensus into an action that drives forward motion.
            This
    motion reflects the common understanding that this is not a re-chartering
    effort, that cloud is not a revolution, but rather an evolutionary step
    further down the distributed computing path on which IDtrust has already
    made great progress.  We wish not to denigrate the work already happening
    in IDtrust, nor to give cloud more emphasis than it deserves, but to acknowledge
    the attention that cloud is receiving in the press and the member companies.
     Reworking the name of the member section to include “cloud” seems
    to achieve that nuanced accommodation.
            Other
    variations of the name were considered, like “Cloud IDtrust” (which would
    preserve the geeky chic of the original “IDtrust”), but this would likely
    be spoken of as “clouded trust”, which is not at all the message we would
    wish to convey.  “Cloud and IDtrust” would be another possibility,
    but that name seems to fail to reflect the true synergy between the two
    areas, almost as if the two are being contrasted with each other.

    Bruce A Rich
    brich at-sign us dot ibm dot com




  • 2.  RE: Motion for your consideration

    Posted 12-02-2011 21:13
      |   view attached




    Bruce,
     
    Thanks for teeing this up before the meeting.  It may be a requirement that the name change would need Member section vote, which Dee can help answer, but first
    step is to get agreement of the Steering Committee to take this step. 
     
    John
     
    John Sabo
    CA Technologies
    Director, Global Government Relations
    Tel:        +1 202-513-6304
    Mobile:  +1 443-629-6198
    john.t.sabo@ca.com


     
     

    From: Bruce Rich [mailto:brich@us.ibm.com]

    Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 4:02 PM
    To: idtrust-sc@lists.oasis-open.org
    Cc: dee.schur@oasis-open.org; Sabo, John T
    Subject: Motion for your consideration

     
    Since I tend to be more of a ruminant than an improvisational type, I thought I'd put together a few thoughts before the meeting next week, and allow folks to think about it
    between now and then.  At that time, my plan is to bring it forward as a motion.  So this should either be an agenda item, or we need to leave some time for AOB.


    Motion:                Change the name of the “IDtrust” member section to the “Identity, Trust and the Cloud” member section


    Rationale:        As a steering committee, we have discussed ways to better harness the energies around cloud computing.  Absent a concrete proposal, we have general consensus that such energies exist, that they are likely to persist, and that attracting relevant
    standards activities to OASIS would benefit all.  This motion is an attempt to solidify that general consensus into an action that drives forward motion.

            This motion reflects the common understanding that this is not a re-chartering effort, that cloud is not a revolution, but rather an evolutionary step further down the distributed computing path on which IDtrust has already made great progress.  We
    wish not to denigrate the work already happening in IDtrust, nor to give cloud more emphasis than it deserves, but to acknowledge the attention that cloud is receiving in the press and the member companies.  Reworking the name of the member section to include
    “cloud” seems to achieve that nuanced accommodation.
            Other variations of the name were considered, like “Cloud IDtrust” (which would preserve the geeky chic of the original “IDtrust”), but this would likely be spoken of as “clouded trust”, which is not at all the message we would wish to convey.  “Cloud
    and IDtrust” would be another possibility, but that name seems to fail to reflect the true synergy between the two areas, almost as if the two are being contrasted with each other.


    Bruce A Rich
    brich at-sign us dot ibm dot com