OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC

 View Only

  • 1.  Inline Markup SC passes on its proposal to the TC

    Posted 12-11-2012 15:48
    Hi everyone, The Inline markup sub-committee has concluded its work. The proposal we have worked on since many months is now officially in the hands of the TC. The motion for this has been passed unanimously and recorded here: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-inline/201212/msg00004.html (Note that I'll post an informal ballot to the SC so the members without voting rights currently can record their opinion). The proposal is already part of the current main draft. There is one change that was decided today: In section 2.6.7.1: old text = "• User agents may leave the existing target unchanged." new text = "• User agents may leave the segment without target." Fredrik will commit the change in the coming days. This should address the first part of Jung's comment made here: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201212/msg00024.html The second part: How to prevent (re-)segmentation is a TC matter and currently being discussed that does not affect the inline markup. The sub-committee has no more work to do. Many thanks for the SC members for your participation, especially at the Dublin face-to-face where we made a lot of progress. No additional SC meetings are expected. cheers, -yves


  • 2.  Re: [xliff-inline] Inline Markup SC passes on its proposal to the TC

    Posted 12-11-2012 15:58
    Thanks to Yves, for chairing and driving the effort. BTW, I will reprint the spec immediately once I see that Fredrik has committed the minor PR clarification. Just one last clarification: I assume that the name changes are pending until after TC discussion of the while proposal including the name change and Yves (or Fredrik?) will implement the name changes after TC has dealt with the SC proposal, right? The editorial note will be removed at that point. Cheers dF Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC CNGL LT-Web CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 mailto: david.filip@ul.ie On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com > wrote: Hi everyone, The Inline markup sub-committee has concluded its work. The proposal we have worked on since many months is now officially in the hands of the TC. The motion for this has been passed unanimously and recorded here: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-inline/201212/msg00004.html (Note that I'll post an informal ballot to the SC so the members without voting rights currently can record their opinion). The proposal is already part of the current main draft. There is one change that was decided today: In section 2.6.7.1 : old text = "• User agents may leave the existing target unchanged." new text = "• User agents may leave the segment without target." Fredrik will commit the change in the coming days. This should address the first part of Jung's comment made here: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201212/msg00024.html The second part: How to prevent (re-)segmentation is a TC matter and currently being discussed that does not affect the inline markup. The sub-committee has no more work to do. Many thanks for the SC members for your participation, especially at the Dublin face-to-face where we made a lot of progress. No additional SC meetings are expected. cheers, -yves --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-inline-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: xliff-inline-help@lists.oasis-open.org


  • 3.  RE: [xliff-inline] Inline Markup SC passes on its proposal to the TC

    Posted 12-11-2012 16:34
    > BTW, ... > I assume that the name changes are pending until after TC discussion > of the while proposal including the name change and Yves (or Fredrik?) > will implement the name changes after TC has dealt with the SC proposal, > right? The editorial note will be removed at that point. Yes. cheers, -yves


  • 4.  Re: [xliff] RE: [xliff-inline] Inline Markup SC passes on its proposal to the TC

    Posted 12-11-2012 19:16
    Title: Email signature standard Hi Yves, Is there a link to the XLIFF 2.0 inline elements spec? Best Regards, Andrzej Zydron --------------------------------------- CTO XTM International Ltd. PO Box 2167, Gerrards Cross, SL9 8XF, UK email: azydron@xtm-intl.com                Tel: +44 (0) 1753 480 479 Mob: +44 (0) 7966 477 181 skype: Zydron www.xtm-intl.com         On 11/12/2012 16:33, Yves Savourel wrote: BTW, ... I assume that the name changes are pending until after TC discussion of the while proposal including the name change and Yves (or Fredrik?) will implement the name changes after TC has dealt with the SC proposal, right? The editorial note will be removed at that point. Yes. cheers, -yves --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: xliff-help@lists.oasis-open.org


  • 5.  RE: [xliff] RE: [xliff-inline] Inline Markup SC passes on its proposal to the TC

    Posted 12-11-2012 20:18
    Hi Andrej, > Is there a link to the XLIFF 2.0 inline elements spec? > Best Regards, Yes. The latest draft is here: https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/xliff/trunk/xliff-20/xliff-core.pdf The section 2.6 "Inline Content" provides most of the description of the inline markup. The actual definition of each element is in the section 2.2.3 "Inline Elements" cheers, -yves


  • 6.  Re: [xliff] RE: [xliff-inline] Inline Markup SC passes on its proposal to the TC

    Posted 12-11-2012 21:15
    Andrzej, it is part of the currently exposed Editor's draft at https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/xliff/trunk/xliff-20/xliff-core.pdf There is one pending editorial note and a minor PR clarification to be committed (see Yves announcement), but otherwise deemed final by the SC Cheers dF Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC CNGL LT-Web CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 mailto: david.filip@ul.ie On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Andrzej Zydron < azydron@xtm-intl.com > wrote: Hi Yves, Is there a link to the XLIFF 2.0 inline elements spec? Best Regards, Andrzej Zydron --------------------------------------- CTO XTM International Ltd. PO Box 2167, Gerrards Cross, SL9 8XF, UK email: azydron@xtm-intl.com                Tel: +44 (0) 1753 480 479 Mob: +44 (0) 7966 477 181 skype: Zydron www.xtm-intl.com         On 11/12/2012 16:33, Yves Savourel wrote: BTW, ... I assume that the name changes are pending until after TC discussion of the while proposal including the name change and Yves (or Fredrik?) will implement the name changes after TC has dealt with the SC proposal, right? The editorial note will be removed at that point. Yes. cheers, -yves --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: xliff-help@lists.oasis-open.org


  • 7.  Re: [xliff-inline] Inline Markup SC passes on its proposal to the TC

    Posted 12-11-2012 15:58
    Thanks to Yves, for chairing and driving the effort. BTW, I will reprint the spec immediately once I see that Fredrik has committed the minor PR clarification. Just one last clarification: I assume that the name changes are pending until after TC discussion of the while proposal including the name change and Yves (or Fredrik?) will implement the name changes after TC has dealt with the SC proposal, right? The editorial note will be removed at that point. Cheers dF Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC CNGL LT-Web CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 mailto: david.filip@ul.ie On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com > wrote: Hi everyone, The Inline markup sub-committee has concluded its work. The proposal we have worked on since many months is now officially in the hands of the TC. The motion for this has been passed unanimously and recorded here: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-inline/201212/msg00004.html (Note that I'll post an informal ballot to the SC so the members without voting rights currently can record their opinion). The proposal is already part of the current main draft. There is one change that was decided today: In section 2.6.7.1 : old text = "• User agents may leave the existing target unchanged." new text = "• User agents may leave the segment without target." Fredrik will commit the change in the coming days. This should address the first part of Jung's comment made here: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201212/msg00024.html The second part: How to prevent (re-)segmentation is a TC matter and currently being discussed that does not affect the inline markup. The sub-committee has no more work to do. Many thanks for the SC members for your participation, especially at the Dublin face-to-face where we made a lot of progress. No additional SC meetings are expected. cheers, -yves --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-inline-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: xliff-inline-help@lists.oasis-open.org


  • 8.  RE: [xliff-inline] Inline Markup SC passes on its proposal to the TC

    Posted 12-11-2012 18:27
    Hello TC and SC members, I'd like to express my sincere and heartfelt gratitude to Yves for the superb and generous work to head up this critical effort. And I would like to also thank the members of the SC for their generous contributions. This subcommittee demonstrated "text book" execution! Thanks, Bryan
    Original Message


  • 9.  RE: [xliff-inline] Inline Markup SC passes on its proposal to the TC

    Posted 12-11-2012 18:27
    Hello TC and SC members, I'd like to express my sincere and heartfelt gratitude to Yves for the superb and generous work to head up this critical effort. And I would like to also thank the members of the SC for their generous contributions. This subcommittee demonstrated "text book" execution! Thanks, Bryan
    Original Message


Related Content