Greetings! A belated remedying of my earlier failure to post comparison of SVG 1.1 (Second Edition) and SVG Tiny 1.2. SVG Tiny helpfully notes: ***** 1.2.1 Profiling the SVG specification The Tiny profile of SVG 1.2 consists of all of the features defined within this specification. ***** ;-) Very, very roughly, SVG Tiny 1.2 drops: 3.7 Filtering painted regions,
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/render.html#FilteringPaintRegions 3.8 Clipping, masking and object opacity,
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/render.html#ClippingMaskingObjectOpacity (although it appears some aspects of object opacity are retained) 4 Basic Data Types and Interfaces - Some common data types but some that are unique as well. 8. Paths, 8.3.8 The elliptical arc curve commands (missing from SVG Tiny)
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/paths.html#PathDataEllipticalArcCommands 10 Text 10.10 Font selection properties
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/text.html#FontPropertiesUsedBySVG 10.11 Spacing properties
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/text.html#SpacingProperties 10.12 Text decoration
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/text.html#TextDecorationProperties 10.14 Alternate glyphs
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/text.html#AlternateGlyphs 14 Clipping, Masking and Compositing
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/masking.html 15 Filter Effects
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/filters.html I have no feel at all for the amount of SVG usage but do think these two standards are distinct enough to warrant enabling users to use either one. Which one a consumer will support and to what degree a consumer will support a version of SVG, should depend upon user demand. Thoughts? Hope everyone is having a great week! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net Technical Advisory Board, OASIS (TAB) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Another Word For It (blog):
http://tm.durusau.net Homepage:
http://www.durusau.net Twitter: patrickDurusau Attachment: signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature