EM HAVE SC

The HL7 ballot for HAVE 2.0 closed last night.  The ballot passed with 26 affirmative, 2 negative, and 71 abstain. The 2 negative vote are procedurally incorrect.  They refer to another balloter for justifying comments, and that voter abstained.  The voters will be asked to withdraw their negative votes. In regards to comments, there was a total of 6 submitted comments, all from John Roberts of TN Dept of Health.  2 typos, 3 suggestions (text changes), and 1 general comment.  The comment spreadsheet is attached.   Next steps: There is nothing controversial about the comments from John Roberts.  By HL7 procedures, we do not have to vote to accept affirmative comments.  I will update the document based upon the comments. I will distribute the updated document to the HAVE list in the next several days.  We can discuss the comments and my revisions (if necessary) in email.  If a vote is necessary, the next HAVE call is on Feb 5.  (I may be on Jury duty that day.) I will forward the ballot spreadsheet and updated document to HL7 Patient Administration WG and the other co-sponsors.  (I need to check HL7 procedures to see if the WGs need to formally vote to approve the updated document.) Are there any processes we need to invoke on the OASIS side? We (me, Elyse, Rex, others?) will need to check if there are any details to be ironed out between HL7 and OASIS for publication. We publish HAVE v2.0!(?)   I must say, this is the simplest ballot outcome I have ever seen in HL7.   -Scott -------- Scott M Robertson, PharmD, RPh, FHL7 Principal Technology Consultant   Kaiser Permanente KP Health IT Strategy & Policy Pasadena / Torrance, CA 310-200-0231 (office) --------- kp.org/thrive   NOTICE TO RECIPIENT:   If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents.   If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them.   Thank you. Attachment: HL7_IG_OASIS_EDXL_HAVE_R1_I1_2018JAN_comments.xls Description: HL7_IG_OASIS_EDXL_HAVE_R1_I1_2018JAN_comments.xls

FANTASTIC news Scott. Great show of leadership!!! Darrell O'Donnell, P.Eng. darrell.odonnell@continuumloop.com On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Scott M. Robertson < Scott.M.Robertson@kp.org > wrote: The HL7 ballot for HAVE 2.0 closed last night.  The ballot passed with 26 affirmative, 2 negative, and 71 abstain. The 2 negative vote are procedurally incorrect.  They refer to another balloter for justifying comments, and that voter abstained.  The voters will be asked to withdraw their negative votes. In regards to comments, there was a total of 6 submitted comments, all from John Roberts of TN Dept of Health.  2 typos, 3 suggestions (text changes), and 1 general comment.  The comment spreadsheet is attached.   Next steps: There is nothing controversial about the comments from John Roberts.  By HL7 procedures, we do not have to vote to accept affirmative comments.  I will update the document based upon the comments. I will distribute the updated document to the HAVE list in the next several days.  We can discuss the comments and my revisions (if necessary) in email.  If a vote is necessary, the next HAVE call is on Feb 5.  (I may be on Jury duty that day.) I will forward the ballot spreadsheet and updated document to HL7 Patient Administration WG and the other co-sponsors.  (I need to check HL7 procedures to see if the WGs need to formally vote to approve the updated document.) Are there any processes we need to invoke on the OASIS side? We (me, Elyse, Rex, others?) will need to check if there are any details to be ironed out between HL7 and OASIS for publication. We publish HAVE v2.0!(?)   I must say, this is the simplest ballot outcome I have ever seen in HL7.   -Scott -------- Scott M Robertson, PharmD, RPh, FHL7 Principal Technology Consultant   Kaiser Permanente KP Health IT Strategy & Policy Pasadena / Torrance, CA 310-200-0231 (office) --------- kp.org/thrive   NOTICE TO RECIPIENT:   If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents.   If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them.   Thank you. ------------------------------ ------------------------------ --------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/ apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_ workgroups.php

Thanks Scott for this great news!  What we need to do on the OASIS side is review the document and agree there are no substantive changes, vote it to Committee Specification, get statements of use, then go for a Standard vote.   Let’s talk next week with HL7 staff for what is required for “joint release” and make sure we have everything lined up.   Great work! Elysa   From: emergency-have@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:emergency-have@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Scott M. Robertson Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 11:20 AM To: emergency-have@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [emergency-have] HAVE ballot summary from HL7   The HL7 ballot for HAVE 2.0 closed last night.  The ballot passed with 26 affirmative, 2 negative, and 71 abstain. The 2 negative vote are procedurally incorrect.  They refer to another balloter for justifying comments, and that voter abstained.  The voters will be asked to withdraw their negative votes. In regards to comments, there was a total of 6 submitted comments, all from John Roberts of TN Dept of Health.  2 typos, 3 suggestions (text changes), and 1 general comment.  The comment spreadsheet is attached.   Next steps: There is nothing controversial about the comments from John Roberts.  By HL7 procedures, we do not have to vote to accept affirmative comments.  I will update the document based upon the comments. I will distribute the updated document to the HAVE list in the next several days.  We can discuss the comments and my revisions (if necessary) in email.  If a vote is necessary, the next HAVE call is on Feb 5.  (I may be on Jury duty that day.) I will forward the ballot spreadsheet and updated document to HL7 Patient Administration WG and the other co-sponsors.  (I need to check HL7 procedures to see if the WGs need to formally vote to approve the updated document.) Are there any processes we need to invoke on the OASIS side? We (me, Elyse, Rex, others?) will need to check if there are any details to be ironed out between HL7 and OASIS for publication. We publish HAVE v2.0!(?)   I must say, this is the simplest ballot outcome I have ever seen in HL7.   -Scott -------- Scott M Robertson, PharmD, RPh, FHL7 Principal Technology Consultant   Kaiser Permanente KP Health IT Strategy & Policy Pasadena / Torrance, CA 310-200-0231 (office) --------- kp.org/thrive   NOTICE TO RECIPIENT:   If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them.  Thank you.