That certainly works for me. Great idea and thanks for the eye for detail Rex. Darrell O'Donnell, P.Eng.
darrell.odonnell@continuumloop.com On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:15 AM, rexbroo <
rexb@starbourne.com > wrote: If I may, I'd like to suggest we hold off on marrying the Appendix to the main document until I've proofread the latest version. I'd like to handle this informally rather than using JIRA and devoting a SC Meeting to it. So far I've only found five possible errors in the document. If we can get the proofread version of the Appendix ready for SC approval by Monday, I think that would be best. Will that work? Cheers, Rex On 11/14/2017 3:39 AM, Darrell O'Donnell wrote: Thanks Scott - do you consider this ready to drop into a fresh version of the main document? cheers, Darrell Darrell O'Donnell, P.Eng. darrell.odonnell@ continuumloop.com On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Scott Robertson <
scott.m.robertson@kp.org > wrote: Document Name : HAVE 2.0 Appendix B - HL7 Guidance Description Work in progress. Creating guidance on how an HL7-based system can create an HL7 message containing the HAVE report information Download Latest Revision Public Download Link Submitter : Dr. Scott Robertson Group : EM HAVE SC Folder : Standards Date submitted : 2017-11-13 23:45:41 Revision : 1 -- Rex Brooks Starbourne Communications Design Email:
rexb@starbourne.com GeoAddress: 1361 Addison St. Apt. A Berkeley, CA 94702 Phone: 510-898-0670 Virus-free.
www.avast.com