Hi Robin, Looks like virtio-comments bounces all requests. Any idea why? ----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <
MAILER-DAEMON@lists.oasis-open.org> ----- Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 14:09:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Mail Delivery System <
MAILER-DAEMON@lists.oasis-open.org> To:
mst@redhat.com Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Message-Id: <
20180517210942.0519358191B8@lists.oasis-open.org> This is the mail system at host lists.oasis-open.org. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail system <
virtio-comments@lists.oasis-open.org>: permission denied. Command output: ezmlm-manage: fatal: Sorry, I've been told to reject all requests (#5.7.2) ERROR: postqmail-local Error #77 Reporting-MTA: dns; lists.oasis-open.org X-Postfix-Queue-ID: E4CA858191B9 X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822;
mst@redhat.com Arrival-Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 14:09:41 -0700 (PDT) Final-Recipient: rfc822;
virtio-comments@lists.oasis-open.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;
virtio-comments@lists.oasis-open.org Action: failed Status: 5.7.0 Diagnostic-Code: x-unix; ezmlm-manage: fatal: Sorry, I've been told to reject all requests (#5.7.2) ERROR: postqmail-local Error #77 Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 00:09:30 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <
mst@redhat.com> To: Paolo Bonzini <
pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Christoffer Dall <
christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
virtio-comments@lists.oasis-open.org,
Pawel.Moll@arm.com Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Virtio Spec question: Who modifies the used ring? Message-ID: <
20180518000831-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <
bbf233c9-6b04-2b1b-f617-82ab450ca1a5@redhat.com> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 06:13:26PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 16/05/2018 22:42, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was looking at the virtio spec (v1.0-cs04) and I'm confused > > about section 2.4.8 "Virtqueue Used Ring". > > > > It says, "idx field indicates where the driver would put the > > next descriptor entry in the ring...". > > > > Since this is the used ring, and is only supposed to be written by the > > device, shouldn't the text say "...where the device would put..." ? > > Indeed, it's a cut-and-paste error from 2.4.6 (Virtqueue Available Ring). > > Paolo Feel free to send patch, github issue with a Fixes: tag in patch log would be nice to have too. Typo fixes do not require voting. > > Or am I missing something fundamental? > > > > Many thanks, > > -Christoffer > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > > For additional commands, e-mail:
virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org > > ----- End forwarded message -----