An ask for someone who was unable to attend
the F2F and see this presented in person... Can we have someone who worked on the
proposal - provide an example of a STIX 2.1 SCO that is still using the
"deprecated" objects{} list, but is otherwise following the 2.1
spec ? I am trying to avoid commenting before
I understand the whole picture; and this is one part I am having trouble
with (all of the examples are comparing 2.0 format to 2.1 format). I am
trying to figure out which of these proposed changes are breaking, if any.
Its somewhat unclear. - Jason Keirstead Lead Architect - IBM Security Connect
www.ibm.com/security "Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those
who hustle." - Unknown From:
"Struse, Richard
J." <
rjs@mitre.org> To:
"cti@lists.oasis-open.org"
<
cti@lists.oasis-open.org> Date:
01/29/2019 01:54 PM Subject:
[cti] Allan
Thomson's slides on Observed Data Sent by:
<
cti@lists.oasis-open.org> All â Here are the slides that Allan Thomson
is presenting at the F2F today. Rich Richard J. Struse Co-chair, OASIS Cyber Threat Intelligence
Technical Committee Chief Strategist for Cyber Threat Intelligence The MITRE Corporation +1-703-983-7049 (office) +1-703-342-8368 (mobile)[attachment "stix2-observeddata-proposal-f2f.pptx"
deleted by Jason Keirstead/CanEast/IBM] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php