I did not find any stopper comments (see attachment). The last point may warrant some more clarification on quote negotiation workflows. I am not sure if the following flow would also be valid for CTS:
| Party A | Party B |
| send RFQ to B |
|
|
| send first quote to A with price/qty |
| send quote response to B with different price/qty |
|
|
| send second (new) quote to A |
| send quote response to B with different price/qty |
|
|
| send third (new) quote to A |
| send quote response to accept new quote from B |
|
|
|
|
Party A responds to the quote from B with a different price/qty until Party A is happy with the quote from B. Then it accepts the quote.
I think in CTS, you want to let Party A immediately end the negotiation (unless it accepts it) and send a quote of its own to B, switching the role of quote issuer and quote receiver.
Regards,
Hanno.
Hanno Klein
Technical Director
'FIX Trading Community' is a brand of FIX Protocol Ltd. FIX Protocol Ltd is a registered company, incorporated in England & Wales (Company number: 03760285. Registered Office: 13th Floor, One Angel Court, London EC2R 7HJ). This email and any files that may be transmitted within it are intended to be received by the designated person referred to above and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If this email, and any files it may include, have come to you in error, please delete it from your system without disclosing any of its contents, including any files, in any way to anyone, and notify the sender of the error immediately. Please note that all liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. This message does not constitute or form a contract unless expressly stated in the communication to do so. For information on how FIX Protocol Ltd collects and/or processes your personal data, please go to:https://www.fixtrading.org/privacy-policy/ to review the privacy notice.