OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

 View Only

Proposed Agenda for ODF TC Teleconference 9/9/2024

  • 1.  Proposed Agenda for ODF TC Teleconference 9/9/2024

    Posted 09-08-2024 11:38
    NB. I am awaiting artifacts from Jamie Clark for ODF 1.3 that will also
    change our work on ODF 1.4. I don't have them just yet but wanted to
    give you a head's up. I'll post the artifacts as soon as they arrive!

    Greetings!

    The agenda for our TC call on Monday, 2024-09-09

    Time of meeting:

    https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2024&month=9&day=9&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=25&p2=37

    The call counts towards voter eligibility.

    Teleconference Numbers - Access code: 438387

    Canada (use US number)
    Denmark +45 78 77 25 34
    Germany +49 30 255550324
    Hungary +36 1 987 6874
    Netherlands +31 6 35205016
    United Kingdom +44 330 777 2407
    US +1 267 807 9605

    Chat room for meeting is at webconf.soaphub.org/conf/room/odf

    Please send comments to the mailing list.

    1. Dial-In, Roll Call, Determination of Quorum and Voting Rights

    2. Motion (simple majority): Approve minutes of 19 August 2024

    https://groups.oasis-open.org/higherlogic/ws/groups/4bf06d41-79ad-4c58-9e8e-018dc7d05da8/download/72147/latest

    3. Motion (simple majority): Approve the Agenda

    4. ISO News! This will impact ODF 1.3 and ODF 1.4

    The details of the item will be covered more fully by artifacts for ODF
    1.3 by Jamie, which should arrive before I post the agenda on Sunday.
    The changes are "normal preparations for use by other standards bodies,
    so we don't need additional approvals for these changes." That covers
    both ODF 1.3 and ODF 1.4.

    a. A4

    b. Figures - there is one that needs coversion, Jamie will handle

    c. Parts - ISO can't sell part 1 for 127 CH so wants a three part
    standard (Jamie will propose artifacts)

    d. Do all parts need the supplementary files? Does each part invoke part
    3 or are they independent?

    e. Reference ISO Directives - URL is out of date - Remove references to
    the Directives (Putting the Directives in was in the manual when I
    started ISO work.)

    I didn't ask but I assume we need to mirror Jamie's cuts in ODF 1.3 in
    ODF 1.4, plus note it as required for ODF 1.5.

    Bulk approval down to new issues?

    5 XLOOKUP issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4154
    accept the issue (i.e change Status to Open).
    No further action now. When I remember correctly, we decided to set "fix
    version" only for issues which are fixed and keep it empty until then.

    Update issues in JIRA according to TC decisions in calls

    6. Who should do it?

    The following issues are affected so far:

    7. 2023-12-11 issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE_3787
    decision was: close as duplicate of OFFICE-3768

    8. 2023-12-11 issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-3786
    decision was: close as duplicate of OFFICE-3768
    issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-3768

    9. issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4094
    2023-10-09, 2023-10-16, 2023-10-23, 2023-10-30
    Resolution field "fixed" does not fit to current state. We had removed
    it from ODF 1.4 and restored the text from ODF 1.3 for ODF 1.4.
    Resolution should be "unresolved" and the "fix version" should be empty,
    as it is not fixed yet. Comment from MS team is pending.

    10. issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4128
    The status is correct, but the Resolution text box is empty.

    11. issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4147
    2023-10-09, 2023-10-16, 2023-10-23
    We agreed on the proposal, Resolution field should be "Fixed" and
    Resolution text box should contain the resolution.

    12. issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4149
    Was editorial. Nevertheless, resolution field should be "Applied".

    13. issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4152
    2023-12-04, 2023-12-11
    Resolution field should be "fixed", Resolution text box should contain
    the resolution.

    New issues!

    14. Problems with implied iteration (array mode) and rule 2.2.1, part4,
    ODF 1.3

    issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4167

    15. Kind of result is unclear for function INDIRECT in array mode.

    issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4166

    16. section 3.3 part 4

    issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4168

    Hope everyone is having a great weekend!

    Patrick