Hi,
here are my review comments for this item.
I have a small comment that applies to both section 5.18.6 C_WrapKeyAuthenticated and 5.18.7 C_UnwrapKeyAuthenticated. Both sections make the same statement "Of course, tokens vary in which types of keys can actually be wrapped with which mechanisms." I would suggest that the two sections make independent statements "can actually be wrapped" and "can actually be unwrapped" respectively. Or both sections can make the same statement "Of course, tokens vary in which types of keys can actually be wrapped and unwrapped with which mechanisms." Or some similar type of change.
This proposal introduced CK_GCM_WRAP_PARAMS and CK_CCM_WRAP_PARAMS. CK_GCM_WRAP_PARAMS appears to be in the updated header files already, however CK_CCM_WRAP_PARAMS is still missing from the header files.
Everything else looks good.
Thanks
------------------------------
Darren Johnson
THALES
------------------------------