Call will be established by the chair person through https://join.me/dilettant or skype (exceptionally). If participating for the first time, please indicate via email to the chair by private e-mail. We will use our chat room at http://webconf.soaphub.org/conf/room/dss-x for minutes taking.
1. Welcome by the chair (Stefan Hagen)
2. Minutes taker All write into the chat, Stefan assembles and uploads into document area.
3. Roll call
4. Approval of the agenda
5. Approval of minutes from previous calls
5.1 Minutes from call #214 on 2018-08-20: URL = https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/63759/chat_trace_dss-meeting-20180820-214.txt
6. Candidate(s) for Co-Chair position
Candidate(s):
* Andreas Kuehne offered candidature for Co-Chiar position in DSS-X TC. URL=https://www.oasis-open.org/archives/dss-x/201809/msg00004.html Seconded by Ernst Jan van Nigtevecht: URL=https://www.oasis-open.org/archives/dss-x/201809/msg00005.html Also supported by Detlef Huehnlein: URL=https://www.oasis-open.org/archives/dss-x/201809/msg00006.html In addition, supported by Ezer Farhi: URL=https://www.oasis-open.org/archives/dss-x/201809/msg00007.html
* Other conadidates ready for election during this meeting?
Full debate and possible motion to elect candidate(s) as Co-Chair(s)
7. DSS Core 2.0 Status of CSD01 in public review
Announcement and invitation for comment: URL=https://www.oasis-open.org/news/announcements/invitation-to-comment-on-digital-signature-service-core-protocols-elements-and-bi
7.1 Duration of comment period
The public review started August 30, 2018 at 00:00 UTC and ends September 28 at 23:59 UTC.
7.2 Public comments received so far
Note: The TC will not start work on DSS Core 2.0 before the public review has ended.
7.2.1 Query on existing libraries for DSS Version 2.0 (by Dazza Greenwood) URL=https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss-x-comment/201808/msg00001.html """ [...] Are there any libraries or other open source projects implementing this updated protocol? I'd like to try it out as a way to better understand the how the functionality and flow are intended to work. [...] """
8. Profiles
8.1 How to proceed with the X.509 certificate validation protocol.
Aspects that deserve discussion (there are maybe more):
* Approach the SCVP authors? * How to deal with the presumably expired patent?
8.2 Local and Remote Signature Profile
8.2.1 Authentication Procedure for Remote Signing
Question deserving debate and decide if we either:
Refer to RFC 7235 (https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7235.txt) for the necessary authentication procedure for remote signing
OR
Handle the necessary authentication procedure for remote signing in the DSS-protocol itself.
8.2.2 Namespace for SignRequest
Question deserving debate:
Should the SignRequest component be part of either
The cg namespace (cg for ChipGateway)
The dss2 namespace (dss2 for Digital Signature Services version 2)
9. Next meeting
Suggested to meet again on 2018-SEP-24 (usual bi-weekly schedule again)
10. AOB
10.1 Agree to forward the TS 119 442 to ETSI as a TC review. Draft produced by members of the TC: URL=https://www.oasis-open.org/archives/dss-x/201809/msg00001/comments-TS119442V0010-dss-x_v0.2.doc
OASIS Open400 TradeCenter, Suite 5900Woburn, MA 01801USA
Phone+1 781 425 5073
Get Involved
Join an Open Project
Join a Technical Committee
About UsPrivacy