Regular 4th Tue XOMOS meeting

When:  Jan 22, 2019 from 17:00 to 18:00 (WET)
Description:

==========
Agenda:

Rollcall

Scribe

Approve minutes from 8th January

TBP

Outstanding JLIFF schema issues

checking URIs vs IRIs

Check status of potential RegEx solution

Prefixing modules vs. Grouping modules data [Robert might have started experimenting with this in a separate folder. Prefixing considered canonical for now]

AIRobert: Change examples to use prefixes for modules

Review prose spec progress for both JLIFF and OM

TBX XLIFF GM progress

Future meetings

February 26, 2019 ?? 

AOB



==========
Minutes:

Rollcall

David F., James H., Phil R., Robert v.E., Steven L.

Scribe

Approve minutes from 8th January

David: Move to approve minutes

Robert: Second

*MINUTES 8th January APPROVED*

TBP

JLIFF Prague Paper

 

Phil: I made the work available on the Dev branch of my repo and was hoping to update the website I made so people can upload a JLIFF and receive an XLIFF and visa versa

David: Can you create some initial paragraph content for me?

Phil: Yes, I will try and do that by the end of this week.

 

Phil: The difference when you convert round-trip is the paired tags.  When you go back, JLIFF only knows about the unpaired values.

David: People can do post-processing to assign <sc> and <ec> as needed.  It’s fine to serialize with only <sc> <ec>.

 

David: the docbook that is in the repo is the correct format.  We need your bios and a blurb about you. Feel free to contribute content directly.

 

Action: Phil will add content to JLIFF Prague paper

Outstanding JLIFF schema issues

checking URIs vs IRIs (Check status of potential RegEx solution)

Steven: I sent something out this morning to the IRI editors asking about the best way to normatively reference and also on validation.

 

Prefixing modules vs. Grouping modules data [Robert might have started experimenting with this in a separate folder. Prefixing considered canonical for now]

AIRobert: Change examples to use prefixes for modules

Review prose spec progress for both JLIFF and OM

TBX XLIFF GM progress

James: I added introductory information to the primary mapping section about TBX-Basic and the distinction between DCA/DCT. We still need introductory information for XLIFF and to clean up the other sections which still have residual template information

David: Can you go through an mark what you think should be removed?  I can add the XLIFF introductory information.

James: Yes.

David: Is it close to ready to release for comment?

James: I believe the content of the mapping is stable now.  Just a few editorial changes and it should be ready.

David: We will have to wait for the standard (ISO 30042:2019) to progress before we release as well.

 

Future meetings

February 26, 2019 - confirmed

AOB

 



==========
Attendance:
Meeting Statistics
Quorum rule 51% of voting members
Achieved quorum yes
Individual Attendance Contributing Members: 5 of 18 (27%)
Voting Members: 5 of 5 (100%) (used for quorum calculation)
Company Attendance Contributing Companies: 5 of 15 (33%)
Voting Companies: 5 of 5 (100%)