additional monthly meeting

When:  Feb 14, 2022 from 13:30 to 15:00 (WET)
Description:

Find connection link within this action item

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/lexidma/members/action_item.php?action_item_id=3946



==========
Agenda:

This preliminary agenda will be finalized by 24th January 2022.

1. Administrative

  • roll call
  • appoint scribe
  • approve minutes from 17th January 2022
    TBD
     

??2. Material

  1. Agreed changes in the data model (Michal)

  2. Changes to the etymology module (John)

  • DMLex WD Technical discussion
    • Work on serializations
      • XML - Michal and Tomaz, coordinated by Simon
      • SQL - Michal
      • RDF - John
      • JSON - TBD

 

3. Closing Admin

  • Recap of agreed actions
  • AOB

Meeting on 28th Feb will be chaired by Toma?, dF regrets due to a CEN/CLC JTC 21 meeting

March meetings planned for 14th and 21st, 28th cancelled

  • Adjourned 14:37 UTC

 

 



==========
Minutes:

1. Administrative

  • roll call
    Carole, John, Simon, Iztok, Jelena, Miloš, dF
    Regrets from Michal
  • appoint scribe
    Simon with assistence, link to live minutes Google doc (non public0
     
  • approve minutes from 31s January 2022
    skipped to be approved in the meeting on 28th Feb
     

??2. Material

  1. Agreed changes in the data model (Michal) - skipped due to Michal's regrets

  2. Changes to the etymology module (John) - no progress on John's side due to teaching duties

  • DMLex WD Technical discussion
    • Work on serializations - reporting skipped due to dependencies on Mcihal
      • XML - Michal and Tomaz, coordinated by Simon
      • SQL - Michal
      • RDF - John
      • JSON - TBD
  • Discussion of part of speech encoding (based on the example below)

    1. Native values vs. universal dependency values

  • We need to see how Michal dissolved controlled vocabularies into the core and other modules

    Consensus: We do want to provide the interoperable UD based way of encoding but not to enforce it

     

     

  • Here is a small example from MacMillan Simon encoded to test the current data model:

     LexicographicResource: value="Macmillan English Dictionary", language="en", transcriptionScheme="en-fonipa"

    Entry: headword="confound"

                  Pronunciation: transcription="k?n'fa?nd", recording="confound.mp3"

                  Label: value="UK"

                  PartOfSpeech: value="VERB TRANSITIVE"

                  InflectedForm: label="present tense, I/you/we/they", value="confound"

                  InflectedForm: label="present tense, he/she/it", value="confounds"

                  InflectedForm: label="present participle", value="confounding"

                  InflectedForm: label="past tense", value="confounded"

                  InflectedForm: label="past participle", value="confounded"

    Sense: listingOrder="1", definition="to make someone feel surprised or confused, especially by not behaving in the way they expect"

                  Example: text="She confounded her critics by winning the race."

    Sense: listingOrder="2", definition="to prove that something is wrong"

                  Label: value="FORMAL"

                  Example: text="This new evidence confounds your theory."

    Sense: listingOrder="3", definition="if you are confounded by something, you cannot understand it"

                  Example: text="We were totally confounded by her reaction."

     

 

3. Closing Admin

  • Recap of agreed actions
  • AOB
  • Adjourn [no later than 1500 UTC]


==========
Attendance:
Meeting Statistics
Quorum rule 51% of voting members
Achieved quorum yes
Individual Attendance Contributing Members: 7 of 15 (46%)
Voting Members: 6 of 9 (66%) (used for quorum calculation)
Company Attendance Contributing Companies: 5 of 9 (55%)
Voting Companies: 4 of 5 (80%)